Teams

Aging Acefully

2025 70 & Over Fall Women - NA · 6.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-05vs Shavano Park SwingersWon 30
W#1 DoublesMyrtha Horton / Sandy Pena vs Ajay Carpenter / Marion Fitzgerald2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarilyn Koch / Laura Pettit vs Brenda Birdwell / Bobbie Worrich7-6, 7-5
W#3 DoublesDolores Arellano / Julie Fair vs Kay Radla / Nancy Tisdall7-5, 6-2
2025-11-10vs Blossom It Takes TwoLost 02
L#1 DoublesMyrtha Horton / Laura Pettit vs Belinda Canonico / Jan Keen1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDolores Arellano / Michelle McNatt vs Susan Hennessey / Sheila Wilson5-7, 2-6
2025-11-03vs Blossom It Takes TwoLost 02
L#1 DoublesSandy Pena / Helen Schwartz vs Jan Keen / Florence Scrafield1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMargaret Canby / Elizabeth Owens vs Susan Hennessey / Terry Peel5-7, 5-7
2025-10-31vs Shavano Park SwingersWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichelle McNatt / Helen Schwartz vs Brenda Birdwell / Dianne Moe0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMyrtha Horton / Sandy Pena vs Marion Fitzgerald / Shirley Coleman7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMarilyn Koch / Laura Pettit vs Ajay Carpenter / Janice Barth6-2, 6-1
2025-10-10vs Shavano Park SwingersLost 12
W#1 DoublesSandy Pena / Marilyn Koch vs Brenda Birdwell / Mary Stefl0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Owens / Myrtha Horton vs Kay Radla / Nancy Tisdall4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMargaret Canby / Michelle McNatt vs Marion Fitzgerald / Bobbie Worrich5-7, 5-7
2025-09-26vs Blossom It Takes TwoLost 12
L#1 DoublesMyrtha Horton / Sandy Pena vs Belinda Canonico / Susan Hennessey6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle McNatt / Elizabeth Owens vs Judy Langford / Florence Scrafield7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Fair / Dolores Arellano vs Susan Burton / Susan Erhardt4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Blossom It Takes Two5112615144
2Aging Acefully2481023178

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Sandy Pena
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.71
Elizabeth Owens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.58
Michelle McNatt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.49
Marilyn Koch
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.44
Helen Schwartz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Dolores Arellano
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Julie Fair
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Margaret Canby
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Myrtha Horton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sandy Pena + Myrtha Horton7257% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Pena + Marilyn Koch123 matchesnot enough data
Michelle McNatt + Helen Schwartz033 matchesnot enough data
Michelle McNatt + Elizabeth Owens123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandy Pena
19W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
Elizabeth Owens
10W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.71
Michelle McNatt
11W–42L career · 4 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
Marilyn Koch
9W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.49
Helen Schwartz
1W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
65%35%<1%
2.44
Dolores Arellano
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Julie Fair
15W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Margaret Canby
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Myrtha Horton
12W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.