Teams

Sarno - Dwyer

2023 Brevard Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.44 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-09-07vs Viera Regional Park - DarrSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEmily Criste / Lisa LeDoux vs Deborah Phillips / Laura Rouveyrol4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTee Wells / Courtney Thomassen vs Lauren Ranew / Jill Connolly6-2, 6-2
2023-08-10vs Brevard/Helton/Combo18&Over6.5WSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCynthia Simmons / Lisa LeDoux vs Lori Abbott / Amber Saxon6-0, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDottie Sorrick / Jenny Mullowney vs Brenda Knox / Lyuda Saks2-6, 3-6
2023-07-24vs Rockledge - MelendezWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Criste / Lisa LeDoux vs Bianca Lauretta / Nancy Hastings6-0, 6-1
2023-07-20vs Suntree - BresetteSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCynthia Simmons / Jenny Mullowney vs SARA BRESETTE / Amira Tolles2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCourtney Thomassen / Tee Wells vs Anastasia Mika / Sandra Rowe2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-07-10vs EFSC - LeiterWon 10
W#1 DoublesCynthia Simmons / Lisa LeDoux vs Michele Buck / Phyllis O'Toole4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-06-26vs Viera Regional Park - DarrSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDottie Sorrick / Jenny Mullowney vs Jill Connolly / Cindy Cozad6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTee Wells / Courtney Thomassen vs Donna Wallace / Lynda Rippolone6-0, 6-0
2023-06-19vs Brevard/Helton/Combo18&Over6.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesEmily Criste / Ericka Chickowski vs Sara Hatfield / Deena Helton2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
3.40
Emily Dwyer
published 3.5
3.36
Lisa LeDoux
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.28
Tee Wells
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Cynthia Simmons
published 3.5
3.15
Emily Criste
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Bonita Madden
published 3
2.68
Jenny Mullowney
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Melissa Dwyer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Criste + Courtney Thomassen6354% games+13.7% vs expected
Tee Wells + Lisa LeDoux4166% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Courtney Thomassen
65W–45L career · no lines in 2023
8%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Emily Dwyer
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Lisa LeDoux
167W–94L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Tee Wells
129W–96L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Cynthia Simmons
10W–11L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Emily Criste
81W–155L career · 6 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
3
Bonita Madden
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Jenny Mullowney
62W–83L career · 3 lines in 2023
9%91%1%
2.68
Melissa Dwyer
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.