Teams

Harvey

2024 Tri Level Women · 4.0,3.5,3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WESTERN REGION

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-02-17vs Ace,Ace BabyWon 20
W#2 DoublesBrenda Harvey / Victoria Briggs vs Molly Costello / Wendy Gladstone-Brown6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMonica Hodis / Amiee VanHout vs Sara Kelch / Jane Eckhardt6-4, 6-2
2024-02-11vs ROC: Sweet SpotsLost 01
L#3 DoublesKathleen Wilmot / Theresa Croce vs Jennifer Ponce / Alicia Wolk1-6, 0-6
2024-02-03vs Hickey/JohnsonWon 10
W#3 DoublesAmiee VanHout / Mary Clare vs Joan Aiello / Yulia Nedelko6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-01-14vs Hickey/JohnsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesMonica Hodis / Mary Clare vs Rita Johnson / Beth Klintworth1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2024-01-06vs Ace,Ace BabySplit 11
W#2 DoublesKristi Seaver / Victoria Briggs vs Caroline Kurzweil / Jacqueline Sinclair Parker7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen Wilmot / Mary Clare vs Kris Kohler / Jane Eckhardt1-6, 1-6
2023-12-16vs ROC: Sweet SpotsLost 01
L#3 DoublesAmiee VanHout / Mary Clare vs Nicole Sayers / Lynne Shoars5-7, 4-6
2023-12-10vs Hickey/JohnsonLost 01
L#3 DoublesMonica Hodis / Theresa Croce vs Elizabeth Thurnherr / Joan Aiello6-3, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 4.0,3.5,3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ROC: Sweet Spots7220718200
2Hickey/Johnson7219820213
3Harvey3691839268
4Ace,Ace Baby0932449299

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Laurie Saffran
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.46
Amiee VanHout
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Teresa Metcalfe
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.21
Brenda Harvey
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.19
Theresa Croce
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Kristi Seaver
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.11
Monica Hodis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Kathleen Wilmot
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Hilary Hagen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Lauren Tomasetti
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
Mary Clare
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Melissa Garofalo
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Victoria Briggs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristi Seaver + Brenda Harvey71943% games−0.5% vs expected
Mary Clare + Kathleen Wilmot044 matchesnot enough data
Kristi Seaver + Melissa Garofalo404 matchesnot enough data
Brenda Harvey + Melissa Garofalo134 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Saffran + Lauren Tomasetti213 matchesnot enough data
Kristi Seaver + Lauren Tomasetti123 matchesnot enough data
Theresa Croce + Kathleen Wilmot123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Laurie Saffran
109W–88L career · 7 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
3.5
Amiee VanHout
11W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Teresa Metcalfe
53W–80L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Brenda Harvey
79W–143L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.21
Theresa Croce
13W–24L career · 2 lines in 2024
99%1%<1%
3.19
3.5
Kristi Seaver
94W–154L career · 6 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Monica Hodis
25W–37L career · 3 lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
3.11
3
Kathleen Wilmot
36W–74L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
Hilary Hagen
1W–6L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lauren Tomasetti
24W–37L career · 9 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Clare
3W–31L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Melissa Garofalo
20W–8L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Victoria Briggs
27W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.