Teams

ABecker (JCC)

2022 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Mon PM

6 players · average NTRP 3.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-05-02vs LBaldwin (Mountainbrook)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNeill Burris / John Haviland vs Rick Atwill / John Rasberry2-6, 4-6
2022-04-27vs SSofsian (PCC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJeff Morse / Neill Burris vs Jay Offerdahl / Gary Leavitt3-6, 2-6
2022-04-25vs PMayo (JCC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesJohn Haviland / Neill Burris vs Jeff Weiss / Richard Williamson6-3, 6-2
2022-04-04vs CWood (Carmel)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJeff Morse / Neill Burris vs Glenn Willett / Dan Mulligan2-6, 4-6
2022-03-07vs DMatters (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesNeill Burris / Michael Stier vs Tim Moll / Jeff Burrell2-6, 3-6
2022-02-28vs JLuther (Raintree)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Stier / Neill Burris vs Jon Luther / Kevin Dorst6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Men - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Neill Burris
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Dev Desai
published 3.5
3.03
John Haviland
published
2.98
Anthony Hyde
published 3
2.74
Kevin Woods
published
2.68
Jeff Morse
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeff Morse + Anthony Hyde213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Neill Burris
35W–72L career · 6 lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.06
3.5
Dev Desai
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
John Haviland
8W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%40%60%
3.03
3
Anthony Hyde
15W–6L career · no lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
2.98
Kevin Woods
13W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Jeff Morse
20W–29L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.