Teams

CVTA BLUE

2022 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-07-21vs MEA NAVYLost 13
L#1 DoublesColleen Weaverling / Allison Carlsen vs Hope Leoni / Bridget Kelly7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSarah Abernathey vs Megan Murray2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLinda Levy / Cheri Belz vs Debbe Welsh / Kim Zoller3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJanet Ryden / Shannon Derby vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-07-17vs CVTA SILVERSplit 22
W#1 DoublesAnn Larson / Colleen Weaverling vs Elowyn Rich / Maryl Bergeson6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSarah Abernathey vs Bethany Sartell1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLinda Levy / Shannon Derby vs Alisa Mallinger / Amanda Kapolnek7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCheri Belz / Jackie Johnson vs Carmen Gunn / Michelle Karr4-6, 4-6
2022-07-14vs LTA REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesMary Fitzgibbon / Damaris Ayuso vs Claudia Deere / Stephanie Stone4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmanda Phan vs Kate Moin6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesColleen Weaverling / Shannon Derby vs Kris Graham / Amy Paterra4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJackie Johnson / Sarah Abernathey vs Gloria Andrews / Sonia Marrero3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2022-06-30vs RMTC GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesDamaris Ayuso / Mary Fitzgibbon vs Emiko Childs / Penelope Ganter7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAmanda Phan vs Tsugumi Richards7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSarah Abernathey / Allison Carlsen vs Joellen Rountree / Susan Soklin6-1, 6-0
2022-06-23vs MEA REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesSarah Abernathey / Mary Fitzgibbon vs Leslie Allen / Hilary Talocco1-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesAmanda Phan vs Emily Stinchcomb7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesShannon Derby / Colleen Weaverling vs Victoria Koury / Heather Ringoen6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnn Larson / Linda Levy vs Amy Carpenter / Kara McDowell5-7, 4-6
2022-06-16vs LAC REDWon 31
L#1 DoublesLinda Levy / Janet Ryden vs Rose Croghan / Julie Benson7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmanda Phan vs Rebecca Negrete6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCheri Belz / Jackie Johnson vs Tricia Marsh / Laura Zempel6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKathy Lowenstein / Damaris Ayuso vs Susan Rasmussen / Ann Fitzgerald3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-06-09vs BTA BLUEWon 40
W#1 DoublesAnn Larson / Linda Levy vs Brooke Harrison / Susan Moran6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJanet Ryden vs Sara McEvoy6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDamaris Ayuso / Mary Fitzgibbon vs Geeta Lalwani / Barbara Berne7-6, 3-0
W#3 DoublesCheri Belz / Shannon Derby vs Sarah Silver / Nadine Wolff6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Sarah Abernathey
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.20
Kathy Lowenstein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.16
Shannon Derby
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.14
Allison Carlsen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.10
Linda Levy
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.09
Colleen Weaverling
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.79
Damaris Ayuso
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Cheri Belz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Amanda Phan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Janet Ryden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Mary Fitzgibbon
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Damaris Ayuso + Linda Levy5252% games+2.5% vs expected
Colleen Weaverling + Allison Carlsen212349% games+0.1% vs expected
Linda Levy + Janet Ryden101248% games−0.4% vs expected
Shannon Derby + Colleen Weaverling1547% games−1.0% vs expected
Sarah Abernathey + Colleen Weaverling3645% games−2.0% vs expected
Cheri Belz + Linda Levy6352% games−2.8% vs expected
Colleen Weaverling + Linda Levy2542% games−3.4% vs expected
Damaris Ayuso + Mary Fitzgibbon41345% games−3.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sarah Abernathey
41W–50L career · 5 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Kathy Lowenstein
18W–18L career · 1 line in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Shannon Derby
39W–79L career · 5 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Allison Carlsen
30W–26L career · 2 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.14
Linda Levy
57W–71L career · 5 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Colleen Weaverling
45W–87L career · type A · 4 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09
3.5
Damaris Ayuso
21W–43L career · type S · 4 lines in 2022
94%6%<1%
2.79
3
Cheri Belz
24W–36L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Amanda Phan
17W–15L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Janet Ryden
15W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Fitzgibbon
11W–20L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.