Teams

Goode

2022 Lubbock Adult Mixed League 18 & Over · 9.0 Adult Mixed

7 players · average NTRP 4.20 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 9.0 Adult Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.91 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Caleb Diller
published 4.5
4.25
Hannah Quick
published 4.5
4.20
Harrison Marsh
published 4.5
3.93
Paul Goode
published
3.73
Kasey Heinrich
published
3.71
James McCord
published 4
3.68
Angela Trevithick
published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Caleb Diller
1W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Hannah Quick
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Harrison Marsh
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
Paul Goode
10W–4L career · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
3.93
Kasey Heinrich
15W–7L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
James McCord
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Angela Trevithick
41W–34L career · no lines in 2022
<1%8%92%
3.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.