Teams

Serve Aces - Bowes

2025 Loudoun Adult 40 & Over · Loudoun Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 2.88 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-31vs Rentsch - ChallengersWon 20
W#1 DoublesBuell Hollister / Matt Whitfield vs Sanjay Puttaraju / STEPHEN STANDING6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCharlie Haake / Rich Vinnacombe vs Richard Cabellos / James Rentsch6-1, 6-1
2025-07-27vs Rentsch - ChallengersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBuell Hollister / Matt Whitfield vs Christopher Geyer / David Gutermuth5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTim Bowes / Rich Vinnacombe vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-26vs Rentsch - ChallengersLost 01
L#1 DoublesGeorge Leppert / Tim Bowes vs Christopher Geyer / Eyad Noweder5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2025-07-03vs Rentsch - ChallengersWon 10
W#2 DoublesTim Bowes / Jim Craig vs David Gutermuth / Eyad Noweder6-4, 7-6
2025-06-29vs Rentsch - ChallengersWon 10
W#2 DoublesPatrick Gardner / Buell Hollister vs David Gutermuth / Christopher Geyer6-4, 6-1
2025-06-04vs Rentsch - ChallengersLost 02
L#1 DoublesPatrick Gardner / Charlie Haake vs Gene Chun / Barry Hopkins4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesBuell Hollister / Matt Whitfield vs David Gutermuth / Christopher Geyer5-7, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Charlie Haake
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Buell Hollister
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Tim Bowes
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Rich Vinnacombe
published
2.69
Jim Craig
published
2.65
Matt Whitfield
published
2.64
George Leppert
published
2.63
Paul Juergensen
published
2.62
Patrick Gardner
published
2.60
Samuel Meadema
published
2.60
KEVIN CUMMINGS
published
2.09
Christopher Wulff
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matt Whitfield + Buell Hollister213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Charlie Haake
28W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
2.83
3
Buell Hollister
14W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Tim Bowes
34W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Rich Vinnacombe
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Jim Craig
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Matt Whitfield
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
2.65
George Leppert
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
Paul Juergensen
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Patrick Gardner
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Samuel Meadema
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
KEVIN CUMMINGS
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
2.5
Christopher Wulff
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.