Teams

Hunters Green - E. Vickers

2022 Hillsborough Combo 50 & Over · 6.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.20 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-11-13vs Plant City - P. SmithWon 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Dasilva / Hannah Gabora vs Patricia Smith / Anne Jensen-McAvoy6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTricia Cardoso / Annmarie Iwanicki vs Sheila Brown / Julianna Holbrook6-4, 6-4
2022-11-06vs Hills/G. BurkeLost 12
L#1 DoublesAlecia Collins / Elizabeth Dasilva vs Silvia Srour / Joan Whitten2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTina Sturdevant / Sherry Peterson vs Barbara Brosch / Tracey Tupler6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTheresa Mays / Ann Coston vs Beth Hart / Jody McNamee2-6, 4-6
2022-10-23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJanene Culumber / Karen Cleland vs Norma Solters / Patricia Smith1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-10-16vs Hills/G. BurkeLost 03
L#1 DoublesTibbie Farnsworth / Sherry Peterson vs Caralyn Paul / Joan Whitten4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAlecia Collins / Annmarie Iwanicki vs Kristine Genovese / Karen Wilhelm-Mace2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesPeggy Pusateri / Tricia Cardoso vs Lisa Strickland / Jody McNamee4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-09-25vs Hills/G. BurkeSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJanene Culumber / Karen Cleland vs Caralyn Paul / Jody McNamee1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTibbie Farnsworth / Elizabeth Dasilva vs Elaine Jones / Joan Whitten6-4, 6-2
2022-09-11vs Plant City - P. SmithWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnnmarie Iwanicki / Hannah Gabora vs Norma Solters / Carol Guido0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAlecia Collins / Elizabeth Dasilva vs Anita Vestal / Dang Williamson7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSherry Peterson / Peggy Pusateri vs Sheila Brown / Karla Borja3-6, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Tibbie Farnsworth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Ann Coston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Janene Culumber
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
Erin Vickers
published 3.5
2.92
Elizabeth Dasilva
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.86
Peggy Pusateri
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.86
Annmarie Iwanicki
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.82
Sherry Peterson
published
2.72
Carol Guidera
published 3
2.71
Hannah Gabora
published 3
2.67
Theresa Mays
published
2.65
Tina Sturdevant
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Tricia Cardoso
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.55
Carmen Heggen
published 3
2.52
Karen Cleland
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tricia Cardoso + Annmarie Iwanicki241153% games+2.5% vs expected
Peggy Pusateri + Sherry Peterson6749% games−0.6% vs expected
Elizabeth Dasilva + Tibbie Farnsworth13552% games−1.5% vs expected
Ann Coston + Janene Culumber7556% gamesnot enough data
Karen Cleland + Theresa Mays1638% gamesnot enough data
Tricia Cardoso + Tina Sturdevant1537% gamesnot enough data
Elizabeth Dasilva + Tina Sturdevant2345% gamesnot enough data
Peggy Pusateri + Ann Coston224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tibbie Farnsworth
209W–139L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Ann Coston
119W–101L career · 1 line in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Janene Culumber
67W–70L career · 2 lines in 2022
10%89%1%
3.17
3.5
Erin Vickers
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3
Elizabeth Dasilva
115W–108L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
Peggy Pusateri
44W–61L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
2.86
3
Annmarie Iwanicki
85W–59L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
Sherry Peterson
21W–17L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Carol Guidera
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
3
Hannah Gabora
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
2.71
Theresa Mays
6W–12L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
2.67
3
Tina Sturdevant
184W–133L career · 1 line in 2022
13%87%<1%
2.65
Tricia Cardoso
76W–64L career · 2 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
2.64
3
Carmen Heggen
5W–15L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
2.55
Karen Cleland
3W–14L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.