Teams

Brennan

2021 40&Over Women · 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.17 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-07-28Lost 01
L#1 SinglesCheryl Oconnell vs Candice Leonard1-6, 1-6
2021-07-26vs WymanSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCheryl Oconnell / Misty Kaminski vs Linda Capenhurst / Jane Early6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAudrey Cohn vs Amy Chen6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Cimorelli / Claudia Smolinski vs Julia Matthews / Teresa Arena6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSusan Basil / Jennifer Ruggiero vs Lori Wyman / Marnie Belle-Isle4-6, 3-6
2021-07-21Won 10
W#2 DoublesJessica Merry / Cheryl Oconnell vs Carey Ann Denefrio / Cristen Kessler6-3, 6-2
2021-07-14Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCheryl Oconnell / Marnie Belle-Isle vs Margaret Bogumil / Kristin Janese3-6, 2-6
2021-07-12vs Buff: SalvatoreLost 13
L#1 DoublesMisty Kaminski / Julie Cimorelli vs Silva Banboukian Serghany / Mary Ann Grande5-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesShen Lim vs Laura Moyer7-6, 1-3
W#2 DoublesAudrey Cohn / June Brennan vs Rowena de Perio / Jean Jurek6-3, 6-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Ruggiero / Christine Tinnesz vs Nancy Rehak / Nancy Wingerter2-6, 2-6
2021-06-28vs WymanLost 13
W#1 DoublesCheryl Oconnell / Misty Kaminski vs Lori Wyman / Michele McGrath6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAudrey Cohn vs Maura McKenna-Rossow4-6, 5-5
L#2 DoublesClaudia Smolinski / Julie Cimorelli vs Teresa Arena / Jill Belote2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTara Hart-Nova / Jennifer Ruggiero vs Connie Littlewood / Julia Matthews1-6, 2-6
2021-06-14vs Buff: SalvatoreSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCheryl Oconnell / Misty Kaminski vs Mary Ann Grande / Nancy Rehak6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAudrey Cohn vs Laura Moyer4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Basil / Julie Cimorelli vs Karen Hughes / Rowena de Perio2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristine Tinnesz / Jennifer Ruggiero vs Cheryl Turner / Shirley Weisenborn4-6, 6-4
2021-06-07vs WymanSplit 22
W#1 DoublesCheryl Oconnell / Misty Kaminski vs Jill Belote / Teresa Arena6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAudrey Cohn vs Amy Chen2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJune Brennan / Julie Cimorelli vs Lori Wyman / Linda Capenhurst4-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSusan Basil / Jennifer Ruggiero vs Julia Matthews / Connie Littlewood7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2021-05-17vs Buff: SalvatoreSplit 22
W#1 DoublesClaudia Smolinski / Misty Kaminski vs Jan Coleman / Elizabeth White7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesShen Lim vs Molly Connerton6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAudrey Cohn / June Brennan vs Karen Hughes / Jean Jurek7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesChristine Tinnesz / Jennifer Ruggiero vs Shirley Weisenborn / Cheryl Turner2-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cheryl Oconnell
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
3.81
Claudia Smolinski
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Misty Kaminski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Audrey Cohn
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.45
June Brennan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Tara Hart-Nova
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Jennifer Ruggiero
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Christine Tinnesz
published
Julie Cimorelli
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Shen Lim
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
Susan Basil
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Misty Kaminski + Cheryl Oconnell6266% games+13.7% vs expected
Claudia Smolinski + Audrey Cohn4164% games+3.2% vs expected
Claudia Smolinski + June Brennan5356% games+1.8% vs expected
Claudia Smolinski + Misty Kaminski4453% games−2.3% vs expected
Claudia Smolinski + Julie Cimorelli111452% games−3.0% vs expected
Audrey Cohn + June Brennan4352% games−3.3% vs expected
June Brennan + Julie Cimorelli4348% games−8.6% vs expected
Misty Kaminski + June Brennan0546% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cheryl Oconnell
61W–14L career · 7 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Claudia Smolinski
47W–35L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.81
Misty Kaminski
70W–54L career · 6 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Audrey Cohn
146W–120L career · 6 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
June Brennan
46W–39L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
3.45
Tara Hart-Nova
15W–18L career · 1 line in 2021
87%13%<1%
3.35
Jennifer Ruggiero
70W–72L career · 12 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
Christine Tinnesz
3W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Julie Cimorelli
33W–27L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Shen Lim
44W–23L career · 9 lines in 2021
not enough data
Susan Basil
11W–17L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.