Teams

A55 8.0M CV Aten

2025 NEOTA Adult 55 & Over Summer · NEOTA A55&O 8.0 Men

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-07-31vs NEO/Currier/A55&Over8.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesFrederick McLaughlin / Brian Cowman vs Timothy Perdion / Daniel Tyrpak0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesThomas Littman / Julian Norley vs Brian Mathie / Tom Pukys4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSteve Kinnett / Charles Norman vs Philip Christman / Bill Willing6-1, 5-7, 0-1
2025-06-12vs NEO/Currier/A55&Over8.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesFred Krase / Steve Kinnett vs David Currier / Timothy Perdion2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJulian Norley / Paul Nahra vs Tom Pukys / Brian Mathie6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesFrederick McLaughlin / James Duber vs Bill Willing / Dave Immel6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · NEOTA A55&O 8.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NEO/Currier/A55&Over8.0M62141025221
2A55 8.0M CV Aten53121227224
3A55 8.0M TC Limberg44131125208
4A55 8.0M MV Gustafson35121229228
5A55 8.0M WR Manak2691535258

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Charles Norman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Will Schultz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Brian Landsman
published 4
3.27
Brian Cowman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Marc Groedel
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Steve Kinnett
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.04
James Duber
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Alexander Szilvas
published
Eric Vinborg
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Fred Krase
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Frederick McLaughlin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Greg Aten
published
John Schiller
published
Julian Norley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Paul Nahra
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Robert Flacks
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Thomas Littman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Duber + Steve Kinnett191155% games+6.5% vs expected
Julian Norley + Alexander Szilvas7456% games+3.1% vs expected
Greg Aten + Charles Norman4254% gamesnot enough data
Greg Aten + Frederick McLaughlin5057% gamesnot enough data
Julian Norley + Marc Groedel2351% gamesnot enough data
Marc Groedel + Brian Landsman1449% gamesnot enough data
Brian Cowman + James Duber2357% gamesnot enough data
Paul Nahra + Julian Norley314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Charles Norman
34W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%1%
4.15
Will Schultz
119W–35L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.83
4
Brian Landsman
25W–26L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
3.5
Brian Cowman
42W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Marc Groedel
33W–42L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Steve Kinnett
60W–54L career · 5 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
James Duber
46W–36L career · 6 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.04
Alexander Szilvas
18W–25L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Eric Vinborg
17W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Fred Krase
34W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Frederick McLaughlin
28W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Greg Aten
66W–27L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Schiller
14W–25L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Julian Norley
80W–48L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Paul Nahra
62W–22L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Robert Flacks
49W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Littman
13W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.