Teams

Rogers

2022 Montgomery Adult 40 & Over Winter · Montgomery Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-03-30vs GuSplit 11
W#1 DoublesXiaofei Zhu / Hongbo Ma vs Jing Gu / Lei Fu6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesLong Pham vs Jiqiang Ling6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-03-27vs IvanWon 20
W#2 DoublesRenaldo Savady / Ping Fan vs David Mount / Volker Englisch6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJonathan Leung / Hongbo Ma vs Ivan Teelucksingh / Timothy Triplett6-2, 6-2
2022-03-25vs Klein and WhitallLost 02
L#1 DoublesJonathan Leung / Hongbo Ma vs Henry Forster / Juan Jose Tijero2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLong Pham / Tom Whitney vs William Wong / Geoffrey Montgomery6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2022-03-14vs SmashersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLong Pham / Renaldo Savady vs Trevor Lessard / Fatih Selekler6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHongbo Ma / Jordan Glashow vs David Trang / Johnny Hsiung1-6, 4-6
2022-03-08vs Klein and WhitallLost 01
L#1 DoublesElliot Rogers / Long Pham vs Christopher Johnson / James Lincoln6-7, 5-7
2022-02-28vs GuWon 20
W#1 DoublesElliot Rogers / Long Pham vs Chris Ji / Zengzhu Xu3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeff Rosenblum / Renaldo Savady vs Jay Colella / Jiqiang Ling7-5, 6-2
2022-02-26vs IvanWon 10
W#2 DoublesMark Stuart / Renaldo Savady vs Gerald McClellan / Larry Johnson7-5, 6-2
2022-02-17vs SmashersWon 20
W#1 DoublesXiaofei Zhu / Hongbo Ma vs Paul Brennan / Fatih Selekler6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRenaldo Savady / Long Pham vs George Lamont / Rob Dragonette6-2, 6-3
2022-01-22vs SmashersWon 30
W#1 DoublesElliot Rogers / Long Pham vs Rob Dragonette / Srinivas Mirmira6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBryan Kay / Hongbo Ma vs Michael Uh / Fatih Selekler6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPing Fan / Renaldo Savady vs Jagadish Akula / Bryan Necciai7-5, 6-6
2022-01-10vs Klein and WhitallLost 02
L#1 DoublesLong Pham / Tom Whitney vs Richard Laukitis / Henry Forster4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHongbo Ma / Jonathan Leung vs William Wong / Ryan Rohn7-6, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Hong Hu
published 4.5
3.99
Bryan Kay
published 4
3.94
Xiaofei Zhu
published
3.83
Renaldo Savady
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.80
Tom Whitney
published
Alain Zidouemba
published 4
3.74
Joshua Folk
published
3.73
Hongbo Ma
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.68
Long Pham
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.65
Jeff Rosenblum
published
3.47
Jordan Glashow
published
3.34
Elliot Rogers
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elliot Rogers + Bryan Kay3256% games+1.4% vs expected
Elliot Rogers + Long Pham7544% games−8.9% vs expected
Renaldo Savady + Long Pham4162% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hong Hu
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
4
Bryan Kay
68W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.99
Xiaofei Zhu
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
69%31%<1%
3.94
4
Renaldo Savady
224W–182L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.83
Tom Whitney
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Alain Zidouemba
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Joshua Folk
24W–25L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Hongbo Ma
69W–57L career · 7 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Long Pham
143W–130L career · 8 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Jeff Rosenblum
40W–31L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Jordan Glashow
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Elliot Rogers
18W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.