Teams

A18 3.0M CRC Peizer

2022 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over · NEOTA A18&O 3.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-07-14vs A18 3.0M MV1 HaughtLost 05
L#1 DoublesDerron Wrubel / Corey Roth vs John Olenik / Mark Casey1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTyler MacAli vs Nicholas Fasola0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJeff Gardner / Jared Peizet vs Robert Haught / Roy Showman0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJeffrey Hagman vs Sangyoon Lee0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDan Selle / Michael Potter-Schneider vs Hyundong Cho / George Raguz7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2022-07-07vs A18 3.0M CV GreenbergWon 41
W#1 DoublesDan Selle / Michael Levy vs Steve Poe / Mike Carroll6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJared Peizet vs David Deeter3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCorey Roth / Jantzen Roth vs Michael Carlisle / Jeffrey Spencer6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJeff Gardner vs Chris Janson6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Hagman / Derron Wrubel vs Adam Kohn / Paul Fantauzzo6-2, 6-2
2022-06-30vs A18 3.0M WE AyyappanWon 31
L#1 DoublesDerron Wrubel / Jared Peizet vs Kyle Hulewat / Larry Dubin3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesJeff Gardner vs JP Ayyappan7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCorey Roth / Jantzen Roth vs Kiyotaka Fukamachi / Jim Hester6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLeonard Bashkin / Michael Potter-Schneider vs Justin Wilcox / Dino Rizza6-1, 6-4
2022-06-23vs A18 3.0M LT BissellLost 12
W#1 DoublesJared Peizet / Dan Selle vs Eric Bissell / Joe Murphy6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJeff Gardner vs Erik Wasowski0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Hagman / Paul Shand vs Max Roszkowski / Jeremy Clemens1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-16vs A18 3.0M MV2 KingWon 21
L#1 SinglesJeff Gardner vs Christian King4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCorey Roth / Jantzen Roth vs RJ King / Jim King7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTyler MacAli / Paul Shand vs Karl King / Michael Lynch6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-09vs A18 3.0M MV1 HaughtLost 23
L#1 DoublesDerron Wrubel / Michael Levy vs Mark Casey / John Olenik0-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesJared Peizet vs Anurag Gupta6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCorey Roth / Jantzen Roth vs Brandon Carrus / John Hernandez7-5, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJeff Gardner vs George Raguz4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Hagman / Paul Shand vs Robert Haught / Ravi Krishnan2-6, 4-6
2022-06-02vs A18 3.0M CV GreenbergWon 50
W#1 DoublesDerron Wrubel / John Lahorra vs Steve Poe / Brad Lucas6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJared Peizet vs David Deeter6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJantzen Roth / Corey Roth vs Paul Fantauzzo / Chris Janson6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesJeff Gardner vs Mike Carroll6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPaul Shand / Jeffrey Hagman vs Jeffrey Spencer / Carl Parker7-5, 6-2
2022-05-26vs A18 3.0M WE AyyappanWon 41
W#1 DoublesJared Peizet / Dan Selle vs Jim Hester / Gary Nowac6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJeff Gardner vs Kyle Hulewat3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCorey Roth / Michael Levy vs JP Ayyappan / David Shisila7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMichael Potter-Schneider vs Kiyotaka Fukamachi6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Hagman / Paul Shand vs Dino Rizza / John Fenner6-0, 6-2
2022-05-19vs A18 3.0M LT BissellLost 14
L#1 DoublesDerron Wrubel / Michael Levy vs Brian Hendricks / Geoff Fiedler4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJared Peizet vs Qingyuan Fan1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Potter-Schneider / Jeff Gardner vs Eric Bissell / Erik Wasowski0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesCorey Roth vs Reddy Vittedi2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPaul Shand / Jeffrey Hagman vs Dan Fordham / Rishi Goel6-2, 6-4
2022-05-12vs A18 3.0M MV2 KingWon 41
W#1 DoublesJared Peizet / Corey Roth vs Jim King / Christian King6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMichael Potter-Schneider vs Karl King4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMichael Levy / Derron Wrubel vs RJ King / Matthew King6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLeonard Bashkin vs Phil King4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Hagman / Paul Shand vs Matt Burnett / John J King6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings17 teams · NEOTA A18&O 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A18 3.0M MV1 Haught91401026278
2A18 3.0M NC Booher91391131332
3A18 3.0M LT Bissell91351536330
4A18 3.0M TP Licari91341640367
5A18 3.0M PW Keller62231738315
6A18 3.0M CRC Peizer64302044396
7A18 3.0M BV Jeffers44202044347
8A18 3.0M WR Sosinski44192145335
9A18 3.0M SP Benson46232757462
10A18 3.0M GR Gonser46232760489
11A18 3.0M PM Towne46212961448
12A18 3.0M FRR Benjamin35211942319
13A18 3.0M CSC Barry35172351344
14A18 3.0M MV2 King37193170482
15A18 3.0M WE Ayyappan28133775494
16A18 3.0M CV Greenberg19133777505
17A18 3.0M FA Hardman010104084556

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Dan Selle
usually #1 Singles 55%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
2.86
Jantzen Roth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Derron Wrubel
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.66
Corey Roth
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published 3
2.58
Paul Shand
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Eric Zalud
published
Jared Peizet
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Jeff Gardner
usually #1 Singles 44%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Jeffrey Hagman
usually #3 Doubles 88%, also #2 Singles 13% · published
Leonard Bashkin
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Potter-Schneider
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Peter Vinocur
published
Tyler MacAli
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Corey Roth + Jantzen Roth9754% games+6.2% vs expected
Paul Shand + Jeffrey Hagman4356% games+2.3% vs expected
Derron Wrubel + Corey Roth134 matchesnot enough data
Derron Wrubel + Jeffrey Hagman213 matchesnot enough data
Corey Roth + Paul Shand033 matchesnot enough data
Corey Roth + Jared Peizet123 matchesnot enough data
Leonard Bashkin + Paul Shand123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dan Selle
42W–48L career · 11 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
Jantzen Roth
23W–16L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Derron Wrubel
13W–16L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Corey Roth
27W–62L career · 14 lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66
Paul Shand
13W–18L career · 7 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
2.58
Eric Zalud
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jared Peizet
7W–16L career · 12 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jeff Gardner
3W–10L career · 9 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jeffrey Hagman
12W–10L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
Leonard Bashkin
4W–8L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Potter-Schneider
5W–9L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Peter Vinocur
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tyler MacAli
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.