Teams

Scarborough 2

2024 WINTER A18&O Daytime Women · 2024 Winter A18&O 3.0 WOMEN FRIDAY

17 players · average NTRP 2.75 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2024 Winter A18&O 3.0 WOMEN FRIDAY have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Natosha Eskander
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.97
Lisa Hartig
published
2.96
Sara Harris
published
2.82
Barbara Hathaway
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.72
Lorraine Beidler
published
2.58
Lillie Dunlap
published
2.55
Joy McArthur
published
2.49
Deb Clay
published 2.5
2.44
Pamela Purtee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.31
Elvira Ordillas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.23
Juneta Smith
published
Gretchen Whitby
published
Jennifer Brello
published
Linda Tessmer
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Olivia Jarrett
published
Peggy Johnson
published
Terry Greenwell
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deb Clay + Gretchen Whitby2540% games+4.0% vs expected
Pamela Purtee + Deb Clay0537% gamesnot enough data
Lillie Dunlap + Gretchen Whitby134 matchesnot enough data
Linda Tessmer + Elvira Ordillas224 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Hathaway + Pamela Purtee224 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Purtee + Gretchen Whitby044 matchesnot enough data
Lillie Dunlap + Deb Clay123 matchesnot enough data
Elvira Ordillas + Deb Clay123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natosha Eskander
26W–64L career · 3 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.07
Lisa Hartig
53W–35L career · no lines in 2024
<1%57%43%
2.97
Sara Harris
32W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Barbara Hathaway
45W–78L career · 8 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
Lorraine Beidler
57W–104L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
Lillie Dunlap
11W–17L career · no lines in 2024
27%72%<1%
2.58
Joy McArthur
9W–21L career · no lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
2.55
2.5
Deb Clay
41W–76L career · no lines in 2024
0%53%47%
2.49
Pamela Purtee
34W–60L career · 3 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
2.44
Elvira Ordillas
29W–49L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%91%9%
2.31
Juneta Smith
10W–26L career · no lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
2.23
Gretchen Whitby
12W–34L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Brello
6W–15L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Linda Tessmer
8W–35L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Olivia Jarrett
5W–10L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Peggy Johnson
1W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Terry Greenwell
0W–14L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.