Teams

LVanderbosch/JSanderson (OPRC)

2024 Adult 55 & Over League · 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Fri AM

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-19vs PHalvorsen/Trigg (CTNC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesElaine Scott / Anita Matai vs Suzanne Roxburgh / Dianne Petrosino6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCaroline Crownover / Janice Abluton vs Karen Trigg / Vikki Rankin6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2024-04-12vs JThaker/Holmes (BCC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEllen Carlisle / Caroline Crownover vs Karen Schneider / Julie Derrico2-6, 4-6
2024-04-05vs PWilliams/jKDeskevich (Sardis)Won 10
W#2 DoublesTina Hough / Anita Matai vs Susan Grills / Joeline Ohlhaut6-3, 6-0
2024-03-22vs JMu (Park Road)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAnita Matai / Ruth Kelly vs Brenda Jandebeur / Cindy Gorman6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2024-03-15vs NMurphy (WSRC)Won 10
W#2 DoublesJean Sanderson / Kendra May vs Gayle Gold / Kim Pizii6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2024-03-08vs KPredmore (Jeff Adams)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAnita Matai / Caroline Crownover vs Gretchen Hildner / Stephanie McKay2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJean Sanderson / Elizabeth Neligan vs Kristine Predmore / Roxanne Lamm3-6, 3-6
2024-03-03vs JCarnahan (Palisades)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesElaine Scott / Caroline Crownover vs Elizabeth Chuck / Esther Craig3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJean Sanderson / Karol Beverley vs Rene Ernest / Debbie Wilson2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult 3.5 Women - Fri AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Elaine Scott
published
3.24
Elizabeth Neligan
published
3.08
Kendra May
published
3.01
Janice Abluton
published
3.00
Jean Sanderson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.97
Anita Matai
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Caroline Crownover
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Tina Hough
published
2.82
Ellen Carlisle
published
2.78
Patty Woodard
published
Janet Newton
published
Karol Beverley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anita Matai + Caroline Crownover123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elaine Scott
5W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Elizabeth Neligan
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24
Kendra May
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
Janice Abluton
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.01
3
Jean Sanderson
23W–13L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Anita Matai
53W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Caroline Crownover
16W–16L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
2.89
Tina Hough
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
83%17%<1%
2.87
Ellen Carlisle
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
90%10%<1%
2.82
Patty Woodard
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
2.78
Janet Newton
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karol Beverley
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.