Teams

SDNC 3.0 Santaluz Club (2:3)/ Vandling

2023 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC · SDNC - Women - 3.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#1 SinglesKristen Howell vs Bridy Oreshack4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-05-30vs SDNC 3.0 RPTC (2:3)/ SchroederWon 20
W#2 SinglesKristen Howell vs Nila Boquin6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDebbie Kuntz / Christina MacIer vs Giulia Cardano / Judy Song6-4, 6-4
2023-05-16vs SDNC 3.0 RSFTC (2:3)/ SurranLost 01
L#1 DoublesSandra Uribe / Kristen Howell vs Juliana Guillory / Molly Tanner4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesChristina MacIer / Kristen Howell vs Sandra Petty / Rachel Bottomley6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristen Howell / Dawn Reichert vs Betsy San Jose / Joyce Reading3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Kristen Howell
usually #2 Doubles 20%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.25
Rachel Wagner
published
3.21
Christina MacIer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Karen Leininger
published
3.18
Dawn Reichert
published 3.5
3.11
Marla Vandling
published
2.68
Elizabeth Li
published 3
2.47
Deanne Davis
published 3
Sandra Uribe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina MacIer + Kristen Howell14854% games+3.7% vs expected
Rachel Wagner + Kristen Howell7156% games−2.6% vs expected
Marla Vandling + Karen Leininger3553% games−6.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kristen Howell
66W–34L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%50%50%
3.50
Rachel Wagner
17W–11L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Christina MacIer
68W–40L career · 2 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
Karen Leininger
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Dawn Reichert
2W–2L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
Marla Vandling
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Elizabeth Li
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Deanne Davis
2W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.47
Sandra Uribe
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.