Teams

Mountain Baker

2025 MTA Southern Combo 40 & Over - Winter '24 · Women's 6.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-23vs Mountain MorrillLost 12
W#1 DoublesNancy Wentz / Jacqueline Hughes vs Christie Tucker / Linda Gebert7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusan Ross / Anita Wicklund vs Yan Key / Jane Kelly1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCarol Peterson / Karen Baker vs Stacy Crawford / Denise Eilers3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-11-09vs Mountain MorrillWon 21
L#1 DoublesNancy Wentz / Jacqueline Hughes vs Jane Kelly / Christie Tucker3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNorma-Jean Baxter / Susan Ross vs Jacqueline Medeiros / Denise Eilers6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHolly Cannon / Karen Baker vs Paola Mitchell / Julie Harris6-0, 6-4
2024-10-26vs Mountain MorrillWon 20
W#2 DoublesSheila Jett / Susan Ross vs Stacy Crawford / Lisa Rodgers6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHolly Cannon / Alana Kolifrath vs Rebecca Harrell / Judy Munson6-1, 6-4
2024-10-20vs Mountain MorrillLost 02
L#1 DoublesSheila Jett / Karen Baker vs Christie Tucker / Linda Gebert2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesNorma-Jean Baxter / Cathy Amos vs Maria D'Alessandro / Yan Key2-6, 1-6
2024-10-19vs Mountain MorrillLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnita Wicklund / Jacqueline Hughes vs Jane Kelly / Christie Tucker6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTamara Pearson / Karen Baker vs Jacqueline Medeiros / Denise Eilers6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCarol Peterson / Cathy Amos vs Dee Campbell / Lisa Rodgers6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Anita Wicklund
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Jacqueline Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Susan Ross
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Norma-Jean Baxter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Tamara Pearson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Carol Peterson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Alana Kolifrath
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Cathy Amos
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.75
Holly Cannon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lynn Blanchard
published
Sheila Jett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anita Wicklund
3W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
3.38
Jacqueline Hughes
12W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Susan Ross
14W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.06
Norma-Jean Baxter
13W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Tamara Pearson
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.88
3.5
Carol Peterson
8W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.87
3
Alana Kolifrath
3W–0L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Cathy Amos
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Holly Cannon
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
2.75
Lynn Blanchard
7W–9L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sheila Jett
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.