Teams

MCAC:Ally Cats:Harbilas/Hoagland

2022 Cape Adult 55 & Over Women · 8.0 Women Fit 1

18 players · average NTRP 3.92 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-07-21vs MCAC:White:White/WrightWon 30
W#1 DoublesKarin Mazzoni / Tia Lilly vs Marjorie White / Pamela Peek6-3, 5-4
W#2 DoublesMerry Abbott / Amy Rice vs Jeanne Bissonnette / Tish Whitney6-4, 5-2
W#3 DoublesLisa Swansey / Coleen Robbie vs Robin Milstein / Ellen Harris6-3, 6-5
2022-07-14vs MCAC:White:White/WrightWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoanne Mahoney / Karin Mazzoni vs Gail Jacobson / Pamela Peek6-4, 4-2
L#2 DoublesLisa Swansey / Elizabeth Talerman vs Denise Wright / Marjorie White6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristine Taylor / Nancy Whitehurst vs Marilou Barsam / Kathleen Oelschlager6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2022-07-07vs MCAC:White:White/WrightWon 30
W#1 DoublesMerry Abbott / Sherry Crockett vs Jeanne Bissonnette / Tish Whitney6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesColeen Robbie / Elizabeth Talerman vs Marjorie White / Cheryl Vozzella6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLisa Swansey / Kim Sullivan vs Kathleen Oelschlager / Robin Milstein6-2, 6-1
2022-06-24vs MCAC:White:White/WrightWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlison Harbilas / Karin Menegay vs Jeanne Bissonnette / Tish Whitney7-5, 4-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKarin Mazzoni / Tia Lilly vs Marjorie White / Pamela Peek4-6, 3-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Rice / Elsbeth Rowaan vs Marilou Barsam / Cheryl Vozzella6-0, 6-1
2022-06-17vs MCAC:White:White/WrightWon 21
W#1 DoublesKarin Mazzoni / Tia Lilly vs Tish Whitney / Catherine Spahr6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAlison Harbilas / Karin Menegay vs Denise Wright / Desiree Mobed6-0, 5-3
L#3 DoublesChristine Taylor / Sherry Crockett vs Gail Jacobson / Pamela Peek4-6, 4-0, 0-1
2022-06-10vs MCAC:White:White/WrightLost 12
L#1 DoublesGwen Dadoly / Sherry Crockett vs Jeanne Bissonnette / Pamela Peek5-7, 2-3
L#2 DoublesColeen Robbie / Elizabeth Talerman vs Denise Wright / Desiree Mobed3-6, 6-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristine Taylor / Nancy Whitehurst vs Megan Farrell / Catherine Spahr6-0, 6-0
2022-06-03vs MCAC:White:White/WrightWon 21
L#1 DoublesSherry Crockett / Alison Harbilas vs Catherine Spahr / Pamela Peek6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElsbeth Rowaan / Amy Rice vs Denise Wright / Marjorie White6-3, 6-5
W#3 DoublesKim Sullivan / Merry Abbott vs Cheryl Vozzella / Kathleen Oelschlager6-1, 5-6, 1-0
2022-05-19vs MCAC:White:White/WrightWon 21
L#1 DoublesSherry Crockett / Amy Rice vs Jeanne Bissonnette / Pamela Peek1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesElsbeth Rowaan / Gwen Dadoly vs Desiree Mobed / Denise Wright3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesColeen Robbie / Christine Taylor vs Robin Milstein / Marjorie White7-6, 5-2
2022-05-12vs MCAC:White:White/WrightWon 21
W#1 DoublesSherry Crockett / Karin Mazzoni vs Jeanne Bissonnette / Pamela Peek6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlison Harbilas / Christine Taylor vs Denise Wright / Marjorie White2-6, 5-6
W#3 DoublesJoanne Mahoney / Gwen Dadoly vs Ellen Harris / Cheryl Vozzella6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women Fit 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amy Rice
published 4
Christine Taylor
published 4
Coleen Robbie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Karin Mazzoni
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.62
Elsbeth Rowaan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 4
3.61
Sherry Crockett
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.58
Alison Harbilas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.40
Kristina Mousseau
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.33
Lisa Swansey
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.27
Gwen Dadoly
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.70
Netty Hoagland
published
Elizabeth Talerman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Joanne Mahoney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Karin Menegay
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kim Sullivan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Merry Abbott
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Nancy Whitehurst
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Tia Lilly
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tia Lilly + Karin Mazzoni10260% games+0.3% vs expected
Lisa Swansey + Kristina Mousseau4353% games−0.2% vs expected
Alison Harbilas + Karin Mazzoni4452% games−4.5% vs expected
Amy Rice + Karin Menegay11069% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Swansey + Netty Hoagland4453% gamesnot enough data
Elsbeth Rowaan + Lisa Swansey224 matchesnot enough data
Sherry Crockett + Alison Harbilas033 matchesnot enough data
Kim Sullivan + Netty Hoagland123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Amy Rice
22W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Christine Taylor
25W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Coleen Robbie
17W–12L career · type S · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karin Mazzoni
78W–34L career · 5 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Elsbeth Rowaan
23W–14L career · 8 lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
3.62
Sherry Crockett
48W–59L career · 6 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
4
Alison Harbilas
59W–65L career · 4 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
Kristina Mousseau
101W–89L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
Lisa Swansey
172W–132L career · 10 lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Gwen Dadoly
11W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Netty Hoagland
33W–72L career · no lines in 2022
99%1%<1%
2.70
Elizabeth Talerman
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Joanne Mahoney
23W–30L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karin Menegay
39W–10L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kim Sullivan
22W–16L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Merry Abbott
14W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Whitehurst
99W–101L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tia Lilly
51W–35L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.