Teams

Brew I. Sam R.I.

2024 Adult 65 and Over League · 7.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.14 / OAHU

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-09-06vs Makule Hawaii 3-0 65+Lost 03
L#1 DoublesFrancis Achiu / Daniel Schmidt vs AL TAK / Larry RANCHES5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesClayton Ing / Leighton Oshiro vs Russell Choy / John Burns2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBruce Ladeira / Jackson Wang vs Andres Libed / Al Moy1-6, 4-6
2024-09-01vs Hana HouLost 03
L#1 DoublesFrancis Achiu / Curtis Nakamura vs Leighton Lum / Clyde Miyasato2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesClayton Ing / Jackson Wang vs Dean Kozai / Frederick Shaw0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLeighton Oshiro / Bruce Palenske vs Cy Yamamoto / Curt Young2-6, 2-6
2024-08-18vs Plaque AttackersLost 12
L#1 DoublesClayton Ing / Bruce Palenske vs Stan Chong / Jesse Tano3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesFrancis Achiu / Daniel Schmidt vs Conrad Murashige / Steven Balbirona6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLeighton Oshiro / Jackson Wang vs Richard Nakamura / Neal Aoki6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2024-08-11vs Tennis The MenaceWon 21
W#1 DoublesJackson Wang / Leighton Oshiro vs Guy Kasai / Mike Nishikida6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichael Heafner / Francis Achiu vs Milton Kishaba / Thomas Lake4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDaniel Schmidt / Curtis Nakamura vs Anthony Chun / Wendell Kong6-4, 6-4
2024-08-04vs Slamming Agers 65+Won 21
W#1 DoublesCurtis Nakamura / Daniel Schmidt vs Andrew Perez / Richard Vermeesch7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBruce Palenske / Jackson Wang vs Harry Abasial / David Choy6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMichael Heafner / Clayton Ing vs Virgilio Alarcio / Norman Soohoo6-2, 6-3
2024-07-28vs BoomersLost 03
L#1 DoublesFrancis Achiu / Daniel Schmidt vs Virgilio Julian / Danilo Nacionales3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLeighton Oshiro / Jackson Wang vs Darwin Abenoja / Rizalde Sadaya5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMichael Heafner / Bruce Palenske vs Luis Gabrillo / Silverio Sepada1-6, 0-6
2024-07-21vs Match Point 7.0 65+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesBruce Ladeira / Curtis Nakamura vs Charles Leake / Jerry Wheeler3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesFrancis Achiu / Daniel Schmidt vs Bernie Duarte / Gil Bueno6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMichael Heafner / Clayton Ing vs Harry Wong / Jeffrey Wong6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 7.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hana Hou7018310152
2Makule Hawaii 3-0 65+6115615175
3Boomers4312920174
4Match Point 7.0 65+4312922160
5Plaque Attackers34111021166
6Brew I. Sam R.I.2561530213
7Slamming Agers 65+1661532211
8Tennis The Menace1641734225

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Jackson Wang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Daniel Schmidt
published 3.5
3.02
Clayton Ing
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.91
Leighton Oshiro
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.86
Bruce Palenske
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.78
Michael Heafner
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Curtis Nakamura
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Bruce Ladeira
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Francis Achiu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Heafner + Clayton Ing3354% games+2.4% vs expected
Michael Heafner + Bruce Palenske131452% games+2.0% vs expected
Curtis Nakamura + Francis Achiu10850% games+0.4% vs expected
Michael Heafner + Francis Achiu8453% games−0.7% vs expected
Bruce Palenske + Clayton Ing4443% games−7.9% vs expected
Curtis Nakamura + Bruce Palenske1639% gamesnot enough data
Curtis Nakamura + Clayton Ing3348% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Schmidt + Francis Achiu5160% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jackson Wang
69W–92L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Daniel Schmidt
31W–30L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Clayton Ing
35W–37L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Leighton Oshiro
29W–61L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Bruce Palenske
62W–88L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Michael Heafner
60W–78L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Curtis Nakamura
65W–99L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
Bruce Ladeira
7W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Francis Achiu
52W–28L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.