Teams

GSTL55/Nisbet/RLTC

2025 Mixed 55 & Over- GSTL · 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-07-08vs GSTL55/Swartling/Grand DunesWon 21
L#1 DoublesLucy OHare / James Mock vs ROB SAPPENFIELD / Annette Graham6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTonya Fitzgerald / Douglas Bradshaw vs Donna Calder / Rich Ober6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCheri McLeod / Doug Beazley vs Terry Walden / Kim Thomas6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Doug Beazley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Diane Markham
published 3.5
3.21
James Mock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Tonya Fitzgerald
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Lucy OHare
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Lee Ann Bundrick
published
3.10
Nabil Mena
published
2.92
Cheri McLeod
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.90
Cecil Ugarte
published 3
2.88
Renee Nisbet
published
2.86
Wendy Weikel
published
Douglas Bradshaw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Robert OBrien
published
Serguei Pozdniakov
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tonya Fitzgerald + Cecil Ugarte2345% games+6.0% vs expected
Doug Beazley + Cheri McLeod4644% games−15.8% vs expected
Tonya Fitzgerald + Douglas Bradshaw303 matchesnot enough data
Lucy OHare + Serguei Pozdniakov213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Doug Beazley
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Diane Markham
0W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
James Mock
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Tonya Fitzgerald
41W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
Lucy OHare
58W–45L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.13
Lee Ann Bundrick
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
Nabil Mena
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
3.5
Cheri McLeod
4W–7L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Cecil Ugarte
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Renee Nisbet
15W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
Wendy Weikel
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
84%16%<1%
2.86
Douglas Bradshaw
10W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Robert OBrien
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Serguei Pozdniakov
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.