Teams

TRC-AG

Adult 40 & Over Mixed League · 8.0

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SOUTHERN ARIZONA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-15vs SAZ 40+Mixed/ Darrel TomasaLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnne Graham / Chris Madsen vs Holly Polston / Jiang Peng6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathryn Whisman / Benjamin Fortna vs Jennifer Morehead / Robert Feltes4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCindy Madsen / Sam Ritchie vs Francesca Brennan / Wayne McGiboney6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-05-01vs TRC - KBSplit 11
L#2 DoublesSam Ritchie / Julia Corty vs Kate Bessey / Kevin Conway2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKathryn Whisman / Benjamin Fortna vs Andy Bessey / Amy Howerter6-1, 6-4
2022-04-24vs AcesWon 21
W#1 DoublesSuwen Chang / Kathryn Whisman vs Claudia Villari / Jason Freeman7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnne Graham / Chris Madsen vs Elizabeth Gamez / James Buckwalter6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHolly Yamamot-Smith / Thomas Smith vs Javier Mascareno / Elizabeth Hing2-6, 0-6
2022-04-10vs GT-MixedLost 01
L#2 DoublesCindy Madsen / Sam Ritchie vs Veronique Bredas / Timothy Baker6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2022-04-03vs DQs CrewLost 12
W#1 DoublesCindy Madsen / Sam Ritchie vs Lisa Tucci / Patrick Simpson6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesThomas Smith / Kathryn Whisman vs Scott Bronnimann / Carol Corsetti3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRob Charles / Julia Corty vs Barrney Peet / Karen Simpson1-6, 2-6
2022-03-27vs TRC Blurred LinesSplit 11
L#2 DoublesThomas Smith / Holly Yamamot-Smith vs Raymon Cruz / Karen Kiburz6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRob Charles / Kathryn Whisman vs Gunnar Gundersen / Laura Pendleton-Miller6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-03-25vs I'D HIT THATLost 01
L#2 DoublesHolly Yamamot-Smith / Thomas Smith vs Rita Gray / Matthew McManus3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Chris Madsen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.30
Sam Ritchie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.66
Kathryn Whisman
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.62
Holly Yamamot-Smith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.16
Cindy Madsen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.95
Julia Corty
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cindy Madsen + Chris Madsen91249% games−2.5% vs expected
Sam Ritchie + Julia Corty1639% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Madsen + Sam Ritchie213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chris Madsen
190W–73L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
4.40
Sam Ritchie
50W–52L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
4.30
Kathryn Whisman
115W–72L career · 5 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Holly Yamamot-Smith
96W–75L career · 3 lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
3.62
3.5
Cindy Madsen
110W–132L career · 5 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.16
Julia Corty
60W–82L career · 2 lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.95

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.