Teams

TTC - Leiter

2022 Brevard Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.30 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-17vs Brevard - Rockledge / KubeSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEmily Criste / Sandy Dahl vs Michelle Ruether / Amber Saxon6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTee Wells / Bev Wilcocks vs Angie Vorndran / Mary Jo Pecoraro2-6, 6-7
2022-03-07vs Fee - LuerLost 01
L#1 DoublesJune Leiter / Tee Wells vs Erin Conway / Deborah Phillips4-6, 1-6
2022-02-21vs TTC - TaylorLost 12
L#1 SinglesTee Wells vs Terra Hovan6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEmily Criste / Jessica Martinez vs Milena Alicea / Lisa Shaffer7-5, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBonita Madden / Sandy Dahl vs Natalie Taylor / Eileen Stapleton6-3, 6-3
2022-02-14Won 20
W#1 DoublesBonita Madden / Sandy Dahl vs Cristina Faherty / Natalie Oswell6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJessica Martinez / Tee Wells vs Lindsay Stazzone / Kalpana Gadodia7-5, 7-6
2022-02-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesJune Leiter / Emily Criste vs Lina Ruhlman / Linda White7-6, 6-2
2022-01-31vs Fee - LuerWon 20
W#1 DoublesSandy Dahl / Emily Criste vs Ginger Ballou / Deborah Phillips6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTee Wells vs Lisa LeDoux5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-01-17vs EGYC - NierenbergWon 21
W#1 DoublesJessica Martinez / Emily Criste vs Altair Watson / Elizabeth Findley6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesBonita Madden / Sandy Dahl vs Pam Mauzy / Carmen Lauer2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTee Wells / Bev Wilcocks vs Cena Salmon / Kelly Segina4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-01-12vs Brevard - Rockledge / KubeWon 10
W#2 DoublesSandy Dahl / Leslie Pankey vs Lyuda Saks / Arletha White7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.32
Sandy Dahl
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Tee Wells
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Mary Failla
published
3.15
Emily Criste
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.05
Bonita Madden
published 3
2.98
Petra Elliott
published
2.85
June Leiter
published
2.42
Tammy Bertolini
published
2.35
Bev Wilcocks
published 3
Jessica Martinez
published
Tanishia Henderson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sandy Dahl
209W–133L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Tee Wells
129W–96L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
Mary Failla
10W–5L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Emily Criste
81W–155L career · 5 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.15
3
Bonita Madden
5W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.05
Petra Elliott
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%56%44%
2.98
June Leiter
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
2.85
Tammy Bertolini
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
0%74%26%
2.42
3
Bev Wilcocks
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
2.35
Jessica Martinez
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tanishia Henderson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.