Teams

Jones

2023 Anne Arundel Adult Other Weekday Women · Anne Arundel Adult Other Day Doubles 4.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-03-21vs SweeneyWon 20
W#1 DoublesWendy Jones / Craig Friedrich vs Diane Wisbeck / Mary Jane Evans1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarie Thorne / Audrey Gunther vs Donna Worthington / Katherine Tindall7-5, 6-4
2023-03-15vs SweeneySplit 11
L#1 DoublesAudrey Gunther / Marie Thorne vs Diane Sweeney / Tara Ritter6-7, 3-5
W#2 DoublesLisa Mendenhall / June Means vs Karen Anderson / Joi Remoll6-3, 6-3
2023-03-08vs SweeneyLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Mendenhall / Audrey Gunther vs Sara Wagner / Karen Anderson6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2023-02-28vs SweeneyWon 10
W#2 DoublesStephanie Burlace / Craig Friedrich vs Anne Bolduc / Monica Maloney6-2, 6-2
2023-02-20vs SweeneyLost 01
L#1 DoublesWendy Jones / Lisa Mendenhall vs Karen Anderson / Tara Ritter1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-02-15vs SweeneySplit 11
W#1 DoublesWendy Jones / Craig Friedrich vs Sara Wagner / Karen Anderson6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesShelley Williams / Lisa Mendenhall vs Diane McClatchy / Donna Worthington5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2023-02-08vs SweeneyLost 01
L#3 DoublesShelley Williams / Lisa Mendenhall vs Tara Ritter / Donna Worthington2-6, 1-6
2023-01-31vs SweeneyWon 20
W#1 DoublesHeather Dessalines / Craig Friedrich vs Sara Wagner / Tara Ritter6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesValeri Albert / Audrey Gunther vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-01-23vs SweeneyLost 01
L#2 DoublesCraig Friedrich / Audrey Gunther vs Sara Wagner / Mary Jane Evans6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Adult Other Day Doubles 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Craig Friedrich
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.85
Audrey Gunther
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Maura Foran
published
3.65
Lisa Mendenhall
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.55
June Means
published
3.43
Nicole Gunhus
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Audrey Gunther + Lisa Mendenhall5357% gamesnot enough data
Craig Friedrich + Lisa Mendenhall123 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Mendenhall + June Means213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Craig Friedrich
101W–51L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.86
4
Audrey Gunther
172W–114L career · 8 lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.85
Maura Foran
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Lisa Mendenhall
155W–74L career · type A · 5 lines in 2023
15%85%1%
3.65
June Means
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.55
Nicole Gunhus
6W–12L career · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
3.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.