Teams

Wtc - Evaristo/DeAndreis

2022 Broward Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.06 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-02-22vs Broward/Parkland - lesWon 20
W#1 DoublesJorge Balsamo / Andre Sophia vs Arup Dutta / Paul Newman6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRoberto Nieves / Augusto Alizo vs JOSE MEJIA / Alex Gregory6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2022-02-15vs JETC - FlavellWon 20
W#1 DoublesAugusto Alizo / Matt Olender vs James OBrien / JD Sullivan6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAlfredo Tellez / Jorge Balsamo vs Steven Stoll / Michael Gunzburg6-4, 7-5
2022-02-01vs Veltri - SassonWon 10
W#1 DoublesAugusto Alizo / Roberto Nieves vs Vince O'Brien / Stephen Burke6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.87 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.48
Andre Sophia
published 4.5
4.03
3.85
3.85
Roberto Nieves
published
3.79
3.79
Jorge Corrales
published
3.79
Alfredo Tellez
published 4
Boris Horna
published 4
3.73
Jorge Evaristo
published
3.70
Jorge Balsamo
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.68
Augusto Alizo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jorge Balsamo + Jorge Evaristo4254% games+9.6% vs expected
Alejandro Matheus + Franco de Andreis6650% games+1.9% vs expected
Jorge Evaristo + Alfredo Tellez2352% games+0.1% vs expected
Jorge Balsamo + Franco de Andreis161551% games−0.3% vs expected
Jorge Balsamo + Augusto Alizo3259% gamesnot enough data
Alejandro Matheus + Jorge Evaristo314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andre Sophia
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
4.48
4
Alejandro Matheus
16W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Franco de Andreis
237W–172L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
Roberto Nieves
25W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Humberto Valbuena
10W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
Jorge Corrales
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.79
4
Alfredo Tellez
14W–9L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Boris Horna
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jorge Evaristo
13W–10L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Jorge Balsamo
180W–109L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Augusto Alizo
89W–69L career · 3 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.