Teams

4TROY-KOZAK 60DW WE 55&O SEM F2

2025 bSEM ADULT 55 & OVER DAY WOMEN · 6.0 WOMEN WED AM SEM

19 players · average NTRP 3.00 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesChristine Hunt / Carolyn Lacusta vs Monica Padilla / Ivona Gorry6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJane Mellesmoen / Michelle Weiss vs Joan Charron / Allison Cardew7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJan Serota / Pam Kozak vs Maureen Foley-Gardner / Deenie Zonder6-3, 6-4
2025-08-06vs 2BT-SALLEY 60DW WE 55&O SEM F2Won 30
W#1 DoublesDana Shanbrom / Susan Margulis vs Phyllis Jean Miracle / Mary Yee6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Wojcik / Vivian Krokos vs Ann White / Janice Heaphy6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSue Daiza / Marsha Coosaia-Rodger vs Janet Sandow / Christine Arrowood6-0, 6-2
W#1 DoublesCarolyn Lacusta / Christine Hunt vs Ivona Gorry / Edsa Negussie7-6, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLaura Colbert / Anne Hintch vs Maureen Foley-Gardner / Joan Charron3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Jareunpoon / Caren Vondell vs Michelle Halsband / Beth Dumas6-3, 6-1
2025-07-16vs 2BT-SALLEY 60DW WE 55&O SEM F2Won 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Colbert / Dana Shanbrom vs Ann White / Kimberly Danowski6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Margulis / Linda Jareunpoon vs Julie Angeli / Janet Sandow6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDori Wilde / Jane Mellesmoen vs Maria Arnold / Margie Cunningham6-0, 6-2
2025-07-09vs 3FAC-GASPARIAN 60DW WE 55&O SEM F2Lost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Colbert / Anne Hintch vs Barbara Goldberg / Ivona Gorry5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCaren Vondell / Linda Jareunpoon vs Beth Dumas / Stacy Holloman6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDiane Leathers / Dori Wilde vs Helene Kroll / Deenie Zonder7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesChristine Hunt / Carolyn Lacusta vs Monica Padilla / Allison Cardew6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCaren Vondell / Susan Margulis vs Lise Cragen / Elizabeth Denninger7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDiane Leathers / Sue Daiza vs Joan Charron / Helene Kroll7-5, 0-6, 0-1
2025-06-25vs 2BT-SALLEY 60DW WE 55&O SEM F2Won 21
W#1 DoublesMichelle Weiss / Jane Mellesmoen vs Phyllis Jean Miracle / Susan Hooks6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesPam Kozak / Nancy Almond vs Mary Yee / Kimberly Danowski2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Wojcik / Vivian Krokos vs Christine Arrowood / Janice Heaphy5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-06-04vs 2BT-SALLEY 60DW WE 55&O SEM F2Won 30
W#1 DoublesAnne Hintch / Pam Kozak vs Ann White / Janice Heaphy6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDana Shanbrom / Marsha Coosaia-Rodger vs Julie Angeli / Janet Sandow6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJan Serota / Vivian Krokos vs Janna Bull / Christine Arrowood6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 6.0 WOMEN WED AM SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
11VTC-outside-BUTLER 60DW WE 55&O SEM F18120717204
24TROY-KOZAK 60DW WE 55&O SEM F27119513177
33SCWB-WINER 60DW WE 55&O SEM F163171024207
43FAC-GASPARIAN 60DW WE 55&O SEM F244121228222
52NAC-PIERONI 60DW WE 55&O SEM F13691840267
62BT-SALLEY 60DW WE 55&O SEM F21751939255
74SCWB-CRONE 60DW WE 55&O SEM F11881943284

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Linda Jareunpoon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
Jane Mellesmoen
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.88
Christine Hunt
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.81
Marsha Coosaia-Rodger
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.78
Carolyn Lacusta
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3
Sue Daiza
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Vivian Krokos
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.71
Diane Leathers
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Pam Kozak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.65
Susan Margulis
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.64
Laura Colbert
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.64
Caren Vondell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Jan Serota
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Dana Shanbrom
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.59
Anne Hintch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.59
Linda Wojcik
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Dori Wilde
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Weiss
published
Nancy Almond
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Lacusta + Christine Hunt9261% games+10.3% vs expected
Pam Kozak + Linda Jareunpoon3255% games+7.0% vs expected
Laura Colbert + Carolyn Lacusta4352% games+5.9% vs expected
Carolyn Lacusta + Pam Kozak6949% games+3.9% vs expected
Pam Kozak + Jan Serota6352% games+1.5% vs expected
Linda Wojcik + Vivian Krokos8255% games+0.2% vs expected
Laura Colbert + Jan Serota91046% games−1.3% vs expected
Dana Shanbrom + Carolyn Lacusta5556% games−1.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Linda Jareunpoon
98W–85L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Jane Mellesmoen
67W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Christine Hunt
109W–113L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
2.88
3
Marsha Coosaia-Rodger
36W–33L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Carolyn Lacusta
115W–112L career · 7 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Sue Daiza
24W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Vivian Krokos
47W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Diane Leathers
36W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Pam Kozak
95W–91L career · 4 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Susan Margulis
64W–63L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Laura Colbert
100W–127L career · 6 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
3
Caren Vondell
98W–116L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
3
Jan Serota
35W–47L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.63
3
Dana Shanbrom
96W–77L career · 5 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
3
Anne Hintch
29W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.59
Linda Wojcik
45W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.59
Dori Wilde
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Weiss
32W–47L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Almond
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.