Teams

Eagle Harbor - Jansen

2022 Duval Trilevel Women · 2.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.07 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2022-08-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesJackie Kent / Kimberly Schoof vs Kim Barelare / Julie Runnfeldt7-6, 6-3
2022-06-15Won 10
W#1 DoublesJackie Kent / Kimberly Schoof vs Linda Johnson / Michelle Johnson6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Christie Jones
published 4
2.93
Kelly Glavin
published
2.92
Toni McCormack
published
2.86
Lori Mercer
published
2.80
Patricia Linge
published
Cristina Thomas
published 3
Elaine Paschal
published 3
2.74
Erica Washkill
published 3
2.70
Sarah Cornell
published
2.66
Sita Shah
published
2.58
Beth Jansen
published 3
Brenda Campbell
published 2.5
Julie Stofan
published
Kimberly Schoof
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Schnell
published
Teri Harvey
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christie Jones
26W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
Kelly Glavin
3W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
Toni McCormack
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
2.92
Lori Mercer
11W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
2.86
Patricia Linge
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Christy Surgeoner
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Cristina Thomas
1W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Elaine Paschal
2W–0L career · type S · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Erica Washkill
9W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
2.74
Sarah Cornell
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
2.70
Sita Shah
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Beth Jansen
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
2.58
2.5
Brenda Campbell
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Stofan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kimberly Schoof
36W–35L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Schnell
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Teri Harvey
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.