Teams

6WESS-MORAN 55MEN SEM

2024 SEM FALL COMBO DOUBLES · MEN 55 COMBO SEM

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-17vs 4LIB-ELLIOTT 55MEN SEMWon 20
W#1 DoublesFrank Anderson / Dinesh Cyanam vs Wade Cooper / Brendan Kochunas5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristian Ibanez / Hugo Moran vs Christopher Parker / Sean Robenalt6-3, 6-2
2024-11-09vs 3EAST-PERKINS 55MEN SEMSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnthony Crowe / Dinesh Cyanam vs Albert Johnson / Ronald Perkins4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSandeep Menon Komattil / Hugo Moran vs Howard Barrons / Jackey Chen6-3, 6-3
2024-10-27vs 2TROY-DIX 55MEN SEMSplit 11
W#2 DoublesChristian Ibanez / Venkata Soma Mamidi vs David Dix / Ravi Ayappa6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSandeep Menon Komattil / Dinesh Cyanam vs Will Wittig / Greg Jones1-6, 1-6
2024-10-18vs 8WESS-SOLOMON 55MEN SEMSplit 11
L#2 DoublesFrank Anderson / Venkata Soma Mamidi vs Parag Patre / Brian Schouten2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAnthony Crowe / Dinesh Cyanam vs Jon Phou / Mike Haddow2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-09-28vs 5FAC-ALAIMO 55MEN SEMSplit 11
L#2 DoublesDinesh Cyanam / Sandeep Menon Komattil vs Osama Qasem / Brian Mount0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesVenkata Soma Mamidi / Christian Ibanez vs Adam Mckorwin / Kunal Tipnis7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · MEN 55 COMBO SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
11LIB-REYNOLDS 55MEN SEM5114410108
22TROY-DIX 55MEN SEM5112615141
35FAC-ALAIMO 55MEN SEM4211716139
43EAST-PERKINS 55MEN SEM3310819144
54LIB-ELLIOTT 55MEN SEM2451328185
66WESS-MORAN 55MEN SEM1571125187
78WESS-SOLOMON 55MEN SEM1541430188

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Anthony Crowe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Christian Ibanez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
William Owens
published
2.44
Hugo Moran
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Dinesh Cyanam
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Frank Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Sandeep Menon Komattil
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Tushar Kulkarni
published
Venkata Soma Mamidi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anthony Crowe
31W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
2.88
3
Christian Ibanez
21W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%90%8%
2.81
William Owens
26W–18L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
Hugo Moran
33W–62L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%66%34%
2.44
Dinesh Cyanam
12W–22L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Frank Anderson
5W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandeep Menon Komattil
14W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tushar Kulkarni
4W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Venkata Soma Mamidi
4W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.