Teams

BASALT BLACK

2026 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME - MOUNTAINS

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-28vs AG REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmelie Piper / Susie Demers vs Gay Wisch / Pamela Niro6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSharon Quittner vs Susan Ilitch2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesShauna de Moraes / Carolyn Strautman vs Barbara Sport / Carolyn Hayes6-1, 6-3
2026-08-21vs AG REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesKate McRaith / Lynsey Pulliam vs Barbara Sport / Susan Ilitch4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAmy Daniel vs Nicole McDermott6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesEmelie Piper / Susie Demers vs Beth Simonetti / Mary Jo Murphy6-1, 6-0
2026-08-14vs AG REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesKate McRaith / Carolyn Strautman vs Barbara Sport / Arlene Goetz6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAmy Daniel vs Beth Simonetti6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSharon Quittner / Richlyn Pavcek vs Mary Jo Murphy / Julie Glen1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.10
Amy Daniel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.99
Susie Demers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Shauna de Moraes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Emelie Piper
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.86
Kate McRaith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Lynsey Pulliam
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Carolyn Strautman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Jackie Kaplan
published
2.63
Richlyn Pavcek
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Quittner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Strautman + Shauna de Moraes10358% games+7.0% vs expected
Kate McRaith + Lynsey Pulliam224 matchesnot enough data
Susie Demers + Emelie Piper404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amy Daniel
30W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
Susie Demers
16W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
Shauna de Moraes
23W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
Emelie Piper
17W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
Kate McRaith
12W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
Lynsey Pulliam
19W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Carolyn Strautman
15W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Jackie Kaplan
9W–11L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%2%
2.70
Richlyn Pavcek
20W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
Sharon Quittner
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.