Teams

Public Court Fee

2026 Eno River Tri-Level 18 & Over · Public Court Fee

15 players · average NTRP 3.57 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · Public Court Fee
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Public Court Fee000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Patrick Shields
published
4.22
Aaron Yip
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.94
Tevin Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.88
Mike Meske
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.80
Ryan Kessler
published
3.72
Alex Piasecki
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Aaron Kirschenfeld
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.52
Jeanne Beckley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.15
Meredith Heath
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Maggie Fritz-Morkin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Malinda Hain
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Megan Prieto
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Karen Schmitz
published
2.19
Chris Petree
published 2.5
2.16
Julie Roland
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patrick Shields
40W–13L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.25
4
Aaron Yip
48W–11L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
4.22
4
Tevin Wilson
130W–78L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Mike Meske
26W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
Ryan Kessler
5W–7L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.80
4
Alex Piasecki
10W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Aaron Kirschenfeld
90W–63L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.67
Jeanne Beckley
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
Meredith Heath
41W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.15
Maggie Fritz-Morkin
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.00
3
Malinda Hain
59W–54L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
2.94
Megan Prieto
13W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%2%98%
2.78
Karen Schmitz
5W–9L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
2.5
Chris Petree
0W–3L career · type M · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Julie Roland
4W–7L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.