Teams

SD 3.0 Coronado Marriott(2:2)/ Escobedo

2025 Adult 40 & Over Winter - SD WD · SD - Women - 3.0 WD

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-25vs SD 3.0 Mtn View(3:1)/ BravoLost 01
L#2 DoublesTatiana Sotres / Mariana Escobedo vs Stacy Tomita / Ana Gelastopoulos4-6, 1-6
2025-03-24Won 10
W#2 DoublesMariana Escobedo / Ana Trave vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-02-24vs SD 3.0 CTC (2:2)/ Anderson- TBDWon 10
W#1 DoublesMariana Escobedo / Laura Vargas vs Lyle Anderson / Leslie Vinton1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-01-20vs SD 3.0 CTC (3:1)/ HolzerLost 13
L#1 DoublesKristi Gottlieb / Claudia Garcia vs Karin Copp / Amy Minicilli4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesSofia Zepeda-Carranza vs Lisa Givens7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesTatiana Sotres / Laura Vargas vs Rebecca King / Tanya Strong1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCarla Herrera / Daniela Urrea Salmon vs Claudia Nelson / Jill Russell0-6, 1-6
2025-01-13vs SD 3.0 CTC (3:1)/ HackworthLost 01
L#2 DoublesMariana Escobedo / Daniela Urrea Salmon vs Dianne Lookabaugh / Lucinda Swain6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-01-06vs SD 3.0 Peninsula TC (3:1)/ EvansWon 10
W#2 DoublesMariana Escobedo / Ana Trave vs Wendy Collins / Victoria Lugash6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Veronica Acuna
published
2.77
Mariana Escobedo
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Ana Trave
published 3
2.63
Kristi Gottlieb
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Tatiana Sotres
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.51
Laura Vargas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Carla Herrera
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Daniela Urrea Salmon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Sofia Zepeda-Carranza
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mariana Escobedo + Veronica Acuna134 matchesnot enough data
Laura Vargas + Mariana Escobedo303 matchesnot enough data
Laura Vargas + Tatiana Sotres033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Veronica Acuna
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Mariana Escobedo
28W–55L career · 5 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Ana Trave
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kristi Gottlieb
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63
Tatiana Sotres
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
Laura Vargas
9W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51
2.5
Carla Herrera
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Daniela Urrea Salmon
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sofia Zepeda-Carranza
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.