Teams

BETC-Iwasaki

2023 Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-11-19vs NWW-MC-JayLost 03
L#1 DoublesDebbie Dymarkowski / Carol Markham vs Penny Jay / Cindy Gamber1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLauri Iwasaki / Martha Shefveland vs Diane Lee / Jan Day6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJuliet Wu / MaryAnn O'Connell vs Jackie Fuller / Jane Repensek4-6, 1-6
2022-11-13vs HBSQ-TierneyWon 21
W#1 DoublesLauri Iwasaki / Jacqueline DeLeon vs Pamela Steele / Cory Jacobson7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMing Vuong / Ruthann Nelson vs Susan James / Kathryn Strecker6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDebbie Dymarkowski / Carol Markham vs JR Thompson / Liz Smalley6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2022-11-05vs CAC/SL-Mayhem Madams-McPhersonWon 20
W#2 DoublesJuliet Wu / MaryAnn O'Connell vs Kim Morrison / Kathy Olson7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNini Do / Laura Jones vs Colleen Tracy / Adawna Windom6-3, 6-4
2022-10-30vs RBW-Net Worth Doubles-GibsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesCarol Markham / Debbie Dymarkowski vs Carmen Pong / Kathy Tsutsumoto3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJuliet Wu / MaryAnn O'Connell vs Maren Gibson / Sarah Bergdahl6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-10-16vs ETC-GoldbloomWon 20
W#1 DoublesMing Vuong / Ruthann Nelson vs Debbie Lo / Cristin Donovan3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNini Do / Carol Markham vs Eden Goldbloom / Camille Elliott6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-10-02vs AYTC-Team Golden-BerlinLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Jones / Lauri Iwasaki vs Rebecca Streeter / Susan Cross4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRuthann Nelson / Ming Vuong vs Sonya Teele / Marci Wright6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJuliet Wu / MaryAnn O'Connell vs Lori Estes / Ann Bowden6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-09-24vs STC-BeaudryLost 12
L#1 DoublesRuthann Nelson / Ming Vuong vs Barbara Maher / Lindy Gaylord4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesCarol Markham / Debbie Dymarkowski vs Colleen Mills / Corinne Crabs6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLauri Iwasaki / Nini Do vs Karen Beaudry / Stacie Feinstein4-6, 1-6
2022-09-10vs BC-CurreySplit 11
W#1 DoublesMing Vuong / Ruthann Nelson vs Anne Bratton / Elizabeth Leider6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDebbie Dymarkowski / Carol Markham vs Bonnie Currey / Ann Carlisle7-6, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Debbie Dymarkowski
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.78
Laura Jones
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.77
Ruthann Nelson
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.73
MaryAnn O'Connell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Ming Vuong
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.63
Carol Markham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Jacqueline DeLeon
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.61
Lauri Iwasaki
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.44
Juliet Wu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Irina Wright
published
Jill Patterson
published
Martha Shefveland
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Nini Do
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ming Vuong + Ruthann Nelson492457% games+0.1% vs expected
Juliet Wu + MaryAnn O'Connell152348% games−2.7% vs expected
Lauri Iwasaki + Ruthann Nelson4553% games−4.4% vs expected
Carol Markham + Debbie Dymarkowski3746% games−11.7% vs expected
Jacqueline DeLeon + Lauri Iwasaki101248% gamesnot enough data
Jacqueline DeLeon + Laura Jones123 matchesnot enough data
Lauri Iwasaki + MaryAnn O'Connell123 matchesnot enough data
Juliet Wu + Debbie Dymarkowski033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Debbie Dymarkowski
69W–87L career · 7 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Laura Jones
57W–82L career · 9 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Ruthann Nelson
112W–68L career · 7 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
MaryAnn O'Connell
31W–30L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Ming Vuong
96W–65L career · 5 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
2.67
3
Carol Markham
39W–67L career · 6 lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Jacqueline DeLeon
65W–65L career · 5 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Lauri Iwasaki
44W–40L career · 4 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
2.61
3
Juliet Wu
33W–56L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.44
Irina Wright
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jill Patterson
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Martha Shefveland
9W–22L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
0
Nini Do
33W–29L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.