Teams

WC ORANGE

2023 TRIO - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - TRIO

9 players · average NTRP 2.80 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-12vs PTC ORANGESplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarolyn Pyron / Melissa Heimbaugh vs Evelyn Snyder / Julie Thorn1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesCaitlin Buckingham vs Brigitta Robinson6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-29vs EM BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesKate Kiker / Melissa Heimbaugh vs Katie Lindsey / Cissie Busch6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCaitlin Buckingham vs Beth Toth0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMolly Mullner / Dani Calkins vs Andrea Lauricella / Robin Farris2-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-04-15vs GAC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Steketee / Jessica Crandall Snyder vs Laney Abrahamson / Leslie Appiah1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesCaitlin Buckingham vs Allison Keefer6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-04-08vs EM REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Steketee / Carolyn Pyron vs Ellen Leher / Brooke Bolinske2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesMelissa Heimbaugh vs Amy Borman6-3, 6-2
2023-04-01vs LEBTC REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesCaitlin Buckingham / Kate Kiker vs Sarah Hays / Sheryl Rose4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKaren Steketee vs Cortney Eisses6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJessica Crandall Snyder / Melissa Heimbaugh vs Michelle Price / Sabrina Smith1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - TRIO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.68
Melissa Heimbaugh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.55
Caitlin Buckingham
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.42
Kate Kiker
published
2.39
Karen Steketee
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.32
Stephanie Block
published
2.28
Dani Calkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Molly Mullner
published
2.23
Carolyn Pyron
published 2.5
2.03
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caitlin Buckingham + Melissa Heimbaugh3744% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Block + Jessica Crandall Snyder224 matchesnot enough data
Carolyn Pyron + Molly Mullner213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Melissa Heimbaugh
54W–41L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Caitlin Buckingham
59W–64L career · type A · 4 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
2.55
Kate Kiker
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
0%72%28%
2.42
3
Karen Steketee
44W–73L career · type A · 3 lines in 2023
78%22%<1%
2.39
Stephanie Block
13W–15L career · no lines in 2023
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Dani Calkins
30W–38L career · 1 line in 2023
0%94%6%
2.28
Molly Mullner
17W–11L career · no lines in 2023
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Carolyn Pyron
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
0%97%3%
2.23
Jessica Crandall Snyder
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.