Teams

ORINDAWOODS 18AW4.0A

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.0

24 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Jennie Kessinger
published
3.91
Stephanie Yee
published
3.88
Pascale Siu
published
3.85
Lana Kaiser
published 4
3.80
Torch Tan
published
3.80
Darla Lucas
published 4
3.75
Laurie Lowery
published
Chelsea McClure
published 4
3.73
3.69
Kelly Kassela
published
3.69
Annette Ellgaard
published 4
3.66
Sally McKay
published
3.64
Mary Anjedani
published
3.58
Sandra Fox
published
3.55
Erika Garell
published
3.53
Sarah Westphal
published
3.53
Nicole Radlow
published
3.42
Jennifer Leebove
published
3.41
Nancy Korich
published
3.32
Karen Pearson
published
Ellie Kann
published
Kay Sander
published
Rene Monday
published
Sharyn Lawrence
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Radlow + Erika Garell1441% games−2.6% vs expected
Kelly Kassela + Mary Anjedani134 matchesnot enough data
Darla Lucas + Laurie Lowery123 matchesnot enough data
Laurie Lowery + Sally McKay033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennie Kessinger
5W–11L career · no lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
3.95
Stephanie Yee
21W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%25%
3.91
Pascale Siu
6W–0L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Lana Kaiser
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%85%15%
3.85
Torch Tan
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Darla Lucas
14W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.80
Laurie Lowery
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Chelsea McClure
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Christine Hohenstein
14W–10L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
Kelly Kassela
5W–9L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Annette Ellgaard
13W–17L career · no lines in 2023
9%89%1%
3.69
Sally McKay
5W–14L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
Mary Anjedani
8W–11L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
Sandra Fox
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
Erika Garell
9W–15L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
Sarah Westphal
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.53
Nicole Radlow
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
Jennifer Leebove
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
3.42
Nancy Korich
4W–15L career · no lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
3.41
Karen Pearson
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
90%10%<1%
3.32
Ellie Kann
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kay Sander
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rene Monday
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sharyn Lawrence
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.