Teams

SDNC 9.0 Surf & Turf/ Lock

2023 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over Winter- SDNC · SDNC - 9.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-18vs SDNC LLW 9.0 RPTC/ DonahueLost 02
L#2 DoublesJanet Podney / Stuart Ridge vs Amit Shah / Bettina Olah2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJenny Sharratt / Jeffrey Ford vs Billy Arenas / Alyssa Aragon4-6, 3-6
2023-02-26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRichette Lock / Eric Jew vs Elena Ramos / Kenneth Brisbin5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDonald McLeod / Richette Lock vs Kenny Hawkins / Stepanka Hastings6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesStuart Ridge / Janet Podney vs Adam Levie / Maria Ward6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2023-02-04vs SDNC 9.0 El Camino CC/ GentryWon 10
W#2 DoublesJanet Podney / Stuart Ridge vs Anne Sabala / Chris Moyer7-6, 7-5
2023-01-28vs SDNC LLW 9.0 RPTC/ DonahueWon 10
W#3 DoublesRichette Lock / Donald McLeod vs Michael Donahue / Bettina Olah6-2, 6-2
2023-01-21vs SDNC 9.0 RBS&TC/ CarmichaelWon 10
W#3 DoublesDonald McLeod / Jenny Sharratt vs Robert Doolittle / Jodi Doolittle7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.33 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.93
Sanem Ahearn
published
4.51
Beth Sharratt
published 4.5
4.30
Jenny Sharratt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.29
Stuart Ridge
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.23
Andrew MacFarlane
published 4.5
4.22
Katherine Steinberg
published
4.09
Janet Podney
published
4.09
Richette Lock
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Donald McLeod
published
Jeffrey Ford
published
Jesse Steinberg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janet Podney + Jeffrey Ford213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sanem Ahearn
7W–1L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.93
4.5
Beth Sharratt
21W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
4.51
4.5
Jenny Sharratt
93W–60L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Stuart Ridge
108W–64L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Andrew MacFarlane
13W–3L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
4.23
Katherine Steinberg
14W–7L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
4.22
Janet Podney
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
26%73%<1%
4.09
4.5
Richette Lock
96W–83L career · 3 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
4.09
Donald McLeod
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jeffrey Ford
8W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jesse Steinberg
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.