Teams

Stichter 55s 6.5 Combo W Tues PM

2025 Piedmont Combo 55 & Over · 6.5 Women 55 & Over

12 players · average NTRP / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-16vs Pressley 55s 6.5 Combo W Tues PMLost 03
L#1 DoublesKelly Smith / Sheila Schmedes vs Krista Pressley / Susan Rogers2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Harvey / Sandra Furr vs Selma Ahnert / Hayes Mills3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRenuka Shivaji / Donna Burick vs Caroline Alexander / Charlotte Boone2-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesSheila Schmedes / Mari Miller vs Kathy Chinnis / Margaret Lynde-Rhyne2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSandra Furr / Joy McClure vs Gladys Dunn / Sue White2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Harvey / Renuka Shivaji vs Jill Elam / Terri Laughlin4-6, 2-6
2025-09-02vs Gorham 55s 6.5 Combo W Tues PMWon 21
L#1 DoublesTiffany Weeks / Paige Turner vs Jennie Pekarne / Monica Medina-Murphy2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSheila Schmedes / Sherri Koenig vs Susan Shughart / Lana Baeten6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMaria Linden / Kelly Smith vs Bobbi McEntee / Joan Johnson6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Sheila Schmedes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Tiffany Weeks
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Maria Linden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Donna Burick
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Samantha Stichter
published
2.84
Susan Harvey
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.71
Linda Widman
published
2.68
Sandra Furr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Sherri Koenig
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Mari Miller
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Renuka Shivaji
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joy McClure
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherri Koenig + Mari Miller2444% games−1.8% vs expected
Susan Harvey + Renuka Shivaji2354% gamesnot enough data
Donna Burick + Renuka Shivaji224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sheila Schmedes
4W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
Tiffany Weeks
9W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Maria Linden
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
Donna Burick
31W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%73%26%
2.91
Samantha Stichter
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Susan Harvey
7W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
Linda Widman
6W–15L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Sandra Furr
0W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Sherri Koenig
6W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
15%85%1%
2.65
Mari Miller
7W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
18%81%<1%
2.63
Renuka Shivaji
8W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
Joy McClure
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.