Teams

LTC-M RED

2026 ITA MIXED - DEN · MIXED 9.5 - ITA

16 players · average NTRP 4.61 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-20vs GAC BRONZEWon 30
W#1 DoublesYana Ruegsegger / Mark Kroll vs Ben DeLuca / Juliet Beckman6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Wadas / Jackson Johnstone vs Pat Kim / Rachel Rodgers6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSAMUEL TORREZ / Zsofia Alfonso vs Emily Cease / Porter Emery6-1, 7-5
2026-08-16vs DTC NAVYWon 30
W#1 DoublesJazmin Gillette / Nick Salazar vs Michael Goodman / Kristen Tourangeau6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Wadas / Jackson Johnstone vs Heather Reimann / Kenny Leavitt6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKimberly Pettijohn / Mark Kroll vs Philip Dankner / Margaret Harwood6-4, 6-1
2026-08-09vs LTC-M GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesSAMUEL TORREZ / Zsofia Alfonso vs Sarah Bi / Austin Miller6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKendra Lord / Mark Kroll vs Alli Berry / Brian Nelson7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNick Salazar / Elizabeth Alcorn vs Lauren Perry / Thomas Cafmeyer1-6, 3-6
2026-08-02vs GAC BRONZEWon 30
W#1 DoublesYana Ruegsegger / Mark Kroll vs Tarrannum Kusick / Ryan Beckstrom6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJazmin Gillette / SAMUEL TORREZ vs Juliet Beckman / Ben DeLuca6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKendra Lord / David Gutkin Indorf vs Chris Cremer / Maeve Kearney6-2, 6-3
2026-07-26vs DTP PINKLost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Gutkin Indorf / Ragini Acharya vs Marcelo Chaparro / Mariana Hosomi3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesRiley Steputis / Kimberly Pettijohn vs Juan Pablo Sanchez Narvaez / Catherine Safieddine2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJackson Johnstone / Adia Farling vs Mindy Tabakin / Peter Hanley3-6, 6-7
2026-07-12vs DTC NAVYWon 21
W#1 DoublesJazmin Gillette / SAMUEL TORREZ vs Weston Blakeslee / Catherine Allen6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRiley Steputis / Kimberly Pettijohn vs Michael Goodman / Margaret Harwood6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJackson Johnstone / Michelle Wadas vs Kristen Tourangeau / Kenneth McDonald6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 9.5 - ITA have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.51 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.20
Yana Ruegsegger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.81
Zsofia Alfonso
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.74
Kendra Lord
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.68
Ragini Acharya
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.55
Jazmin Gillette
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.49
Michelle Wadas
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.46
Elizabeth Alcorn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.42
Kimberly Pettijohn
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.35
Nick Salazar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.34
Mark Kroll
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.31
Riley Steputis
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4.5
4.30
SAMUEL TORREZ
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.26
Adia Farling
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.25
Jose Amador
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
David Gutkin Indorf
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Jackson Johnstone
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Riley Steputis + Kimberly Pettijohn033 matchesnot enough data
Jackson Johnstone + Michelle Wadas303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Yana Ruegsegger
54W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
5.20
5
Zsofia Alfonso
51W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.81
Kendra Lord
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.74
Ragini Acharya
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.68
Jazmin Gillette
9W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.55
4.5
Michelle Wadas
33W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
4.49
Elizabeth Alcorn
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%60%40%
4.46
Kimberly Pettijohn
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.42
Nick Salazar
14W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
4.35
4.5
Mark Kroll
54W–11L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
4.34
4.5
Riley Steputis
40W–29L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
4.31
4.5
SAMUEL TORREZ
55W–30L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Adia Farling
5W–7L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.26
4.5
Jose Amador
315W–162L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
4.25
4.5
David Gutkin Indorf
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Jackson Johnstone
7W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.