Teams

Sports Mall-Shipp/Callister

2026 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.0W AM

16 players · average NTRP 2.95 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-05-27vs PC MARC-Krueger/SchlachterLost 01
L#3 DoublesPenny Gambill / Lindsay Roth vs Cynthia Perry / Amy Watson2-6, 3-6
2026-05-13vs Red Ledges-ArchibaldSplit 11
L#2 SinglesHallie Russell vs Elisabeth Jones4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesHolli Allred / Penny Gambill vs McCall Weekes / Marian Christensen6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-04-29vs Utah Valley-BastianWon 20
W#2 DoublesPenny Gambill / Heather Callister vs Blair Campbell / Lisa Bastian6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesHallie Russell vs Sarah Smith6-0, 6-1
2026-04-22vs PC MARC-Krueger/SchlachterLost 01
L#2 DoublesPenny Gambill / Rachel Stohlton vs Melanie Schlachter / Sandy Phan4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-04-15Lost 01
L#2 DoublesHallie Russell / Jill Raemisch vs Mari Bickmore / Megan Pierce3-6, 0-6
2026-04-08vs Red Ledges-ArchibaldLost 02
L#1 DoublesCameron Nelson / Kami Galbraith vs Elaine Coady / Courtney Archibald0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPenny Gambill / Lindsay Roth vs Suleyka Miranda / Elizabeth Wallis0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.99
Holly Goulding
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 22% · published 3
2.82
Melanie Olsen
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Singles 27% · published
2.77
Cami Shipp
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.67
Heather Callister
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.65
Lindsey Pizza
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.62
Penny Gambill
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.62
Jill Raemisch
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.59
Hallie Russell
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.56
Lindsay Roth
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
2.54
Rachel Stohlton
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.53
Holli Allred
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.37
Kami Galbraith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.32
Cameron Nelson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Lisa Packer
published
Megan Moore
published
Sarah Gardner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Olsen + Holly Goulding7069% games+14.9% vs expected
Jill Raemisch + Melanie Olsen5163% games+14.3% vs expected
Lindsey Pizza + Rachel Stohlton4943% games+7.0% vs expected
Holli Allred + Hallie Russell8751% games+3.6% vs expected
Cami Shipp + Holly Goulding6256% games+3.6% vs expected
Cami Shipp + Melanie Olsen4249% games+3.6% vs expected
Lindsey Pizza + Cami Shipp4252% games+3.2% vs expected
Heather Callister + Melanie Olsen4850% games+2.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Holly Goulding
48W–27L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
Melanie Olsen
61W–64L career · 10 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Cami Shipp
51W–42L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Heather Callister
45W–58L career · 13 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Lindsey Pizza
38W–53L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%86%1%
2.65
3
Penny Gambill
52W–138L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
3
Jill Raemisch
47W–48L career · 5 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
3
Hallie Russell
35W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
2.59
Lindsay Roth
25W–37L career · 8 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Rachel Stohlton
16W–56L career · 9 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Holli Allred
49W–70L career · 6 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
2.53
Kami Galbraith
36W–60L career · 1 line in 2026
82%18%<1%
2.37
2.5
Cameron Nelson
18W–49L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%91%9%
2.32
Lisa Packer
59W–62L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Megan Moore
8W–14L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sarah Gardner
17W–41L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.