Teams

East Lake Bilger USTA 40+

2023 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#2 DoublesEdwin Jagger / Craig Hajdich vs Mike Moenter / Clark MacCullough4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-05-13vs Hills/F. Gonzales/40&Over4.5MLost 02
L#2 DoublesRobert Maisner / Edwin Jagger vs Jeffrey Evans / Alvaro Echeverry4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesWilliam Wymer / Michael Rothberg vs Samuel Biller / Joseph Curtis4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 DoublesRobert Maisner / Matthew Bilger vs Josh Heeg / Patrick Nguyen6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEdwin Jagger / Craig Hajdich vs Clark MacCullough / Brent Fisher6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSteve Crivello / William Wymer vs Christian Stover / Greg Estroff6-0, 6-2
2023-04-22vs Hills/F. Gonzales/40&Over4.5MSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAlejandro Mucino / Alejandro Hernandez Puente vs Fernando Gonzalez / Alvaro Echeverry0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMatt Laccabue / Ronald Wiser vs James Evans / Julio Zeballos6-4, 6-2
W#1 DoublesRobert Maisner / Craig Hajdich vs Jeffrey Stern / Felipe Martinez6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAlejandro Hernandez Puente / Matt Laccabue vs Paul Zack / David Hennessee4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Edwin Jagger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.33
Alejandro Mucino
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
Jason Horwitz
published
4.09
William Wymer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.04
Matt Laccabue
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Michael Rothberg
published
Robert Maisner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Steve Crivello
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edwin Jagger + Robert Maisner4448% gamesnot enough data
Alejandro Mucino + Matt Laccabue1538% gamesnot enough data
Edwin Jagger + Matt Laccabue213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Edwin Jagger
57W–26L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
4.41
4.5
Alejandro Mucino
24W–15L career · 1 line in 2023
1%87%12%
4.33
Jason Horwitz
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
no projection at this level
4.21
William Wymer
14W–11L career · 2 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
4.09
4.5
Matt Laccabue
41W–37L career · 2 lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
4.04
Michael Rothberg
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Robert Maisner
59W–49L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Steve Crivello
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.