Teams

Sims, Allison

2026 Combo 18 & Over-JXN · Women 2.5

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Flight standings4 teams · Women 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Reiss, Beth000000
2Sims, Allison000000
3Munroe, Misti000000
4Stein, Victoria000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.11 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.39
Christine Barron
published 2.5
2.37
Jamie Mask
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.26
Logan Holt
published
Amy Parr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.24
Anna Lucovich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.10
Tracy Roan
published
2.00
Kayla Saranthus
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
1.92
Ashley Markland
published 2.5
1.90
Allison Sims
published 2.5
1.82
Erin Barrios
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Sims + Anna Lucovich1928% games−12.0% vs expected
Allison Sims + Tracy Roan0815% games−12.2% vs expected
Jamie Mask + Kayla Saranthus224 matchesnot enough data
Logan Holt + Anna Lucovich224 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Roan + Anna Lucovich033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Christine Barron
11W–17L career · no lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.39
Jamie Mask
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%83%17%
2.37
Logan Holt
5W–24L career · no lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.26
2.5
Amy Parr
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Anna Lucovich
10W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Tracy Roan
2W–28L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Kayla Saranthus
3W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.00
2.5
Ashley Markland
1W–16L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.92
2.5
Allison Sims
4W–25L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.90
Erin Barrios
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.