Teams

JTC Lancaster

2025 Alachua Combo 50 & Over · 6.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-12-03vs Alachua/Lai/50&Over/6.5MLost 02
L#1 DoublesLawrence Hooghuis / Chris Cochran vs Kewei Xu / Gregg Fissenden1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesPhilip Lancaster / Karl Ingmarsson vs Chihong Yun / Jorge Torres-Vazquez0-6, 3-6
2025-11-22vs DB DemopoulosLost 03
L#1 DoublesChris Cochran / Giuseppe Saracino vs Scott Travis / Jian Pu2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPhilip Lancaster / John Stewart vs Jorg Bungert / Jack Gandolfo3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKarl Ingmarsson / Yoonsuk Park vs George Demopoulos / Malcolm H Waldron III1-6, 0-6
2025-11-08vs Alachua/Lai/50&Over/6.5MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLawrence Hooghuis / Giuseppe Saracino vs Thomas Yonge / Robert Tangeman6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKarl Ingmarsson / Dale Williams vs Van Sherwood / Gary Orr4-6, 0-6
2025-11-01vs DB DemopoulosLost 03
L#1 DoublesLawrence Hooghuis / John Stewart vs Kevin Smith / Scott Travis3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPhilip Lancaster / Frank Kenlon vs Jian Pu / Hank Dudding1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKarl Ingmarsson / Yoonsuk Park vs George Demopoulos / Malcolm H Waldron III2-6, 1-6
2025-10-18vs Alachua/Lai/50&Over/6.5MLost 01
L#1 DoublesLawrence Hooghuis / Giuseppe Saracino vs Chihong Yun / Jorge Torres-Vazquez4-6, 3-6
2025-10-11vs DB DemopoulosLost 02
L#2 DoublesKarl Ingmarsson / Attila Bodo vs Malcolm H Waldron III / Hank Dudding6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChris Cochran / Lawrence Hooghuis vs Jack Gandolfo / Jorg Bungert6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Chris Cochran
published 3.5
3.11
Lawrence Hooghuis
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.73
Dale Williams
published 3
2.65
Giuseppe Saracino
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.57
Philip Lancaster
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Attila Bodo
published 3
2.55
Karl Ingmarsson
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.52
Yoonsuk Park
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Chris Cochran
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Lawrence Hooghuis
53W–135L career · 7 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Dale Williams
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Giuseppe Saracino
23W–35L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
2.65
3
Philip Lancaster
90W–227L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Attila Bodo
0W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
Karl Ingmarsson
1W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
2.55
Yoonsuk Park
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.