Teams

BC-ErnieHowlett/NormaIskenderian

2022 Mixed 55 & Over - SEASON TWO - BC LOCAL LEAGUE · BC - Mixed 55 & Over - 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-06-26vs BC-MCC/MikeYogiLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlfred Ross / Leslie Winston vs Marci Beech / Gary Premeaux6-7, 3-6
2022-06-19vs BC-PVTC/IanForsythLost 01
L#3 DoublesJohn Abelson / Lynn Abelson vs Patrick Pittenger / Stephanie Guggenheim4-6, 0-6
2022-05-21vs BC-AltaVista/MauriceKoganLost 01
L#1 DoublesJohn Abelson / Lynn Abelson vs Mark Gross / Marlowe Sutton0-6, 0-6
2022-05-15vs BC-MCC/MikeYogiWon 10
W#2 DoublesLynn Abelson / Alfred Ross vs Joi Gillam / Gary Premeaux6-4, 7-6
2022-04-09vs BC-AltaVista/MauriceKoganLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Wandrey / Leslie Winston vs Rik Einarsson / Marlowe Sutton1-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC - Mixed 55 & Over - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
SAL DEGUZMAN
published 3.5
3.27
Alfred Ross
published 3.5
John Henderson
published 3.5
3.23
Milagros Holub
published
3.21
Mari Bellas
published
3.20
Hazel Evans
published 3.5
3.14
Tara Aviel
published
3.06
Lynn Abelson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.95
Leslie Winston
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Dolly Pham
published 3
2.73
John Abelson
published
2.73
Sharon Alston
published 3
Juan Mendez
published
Mina Jorgensen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharon Alston + SAL DEGUZMAN224 matchesnot enough data
SAL DEGUZMAN + Tara Aviel213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
SAL DEGUZMAN
17W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Alfred Ross
2W–2L career · type M · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
John Henderson
no matches on record · type M · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Milagros Holub
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Mari Bellas
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Hazel Evans
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Tara Aviel
10W–18L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Lynn Abelson
49W–79L career · 3 lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Leslie Winston
47W–104L career · 2 lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
2.95
3
Dolly Pham
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
John Abelson
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Sharon Alston
48W–58L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Juan Mendez
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Mina Jorgensen
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.