Teams

OC LNRC - Jeff

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over - OC WE · OC Men - 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for OC Men - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
John Homans
published
3.49
Peter Barbaresi
published
3.33
Jeffrey Heald
published
David Nachreiner
published 3.5
3.21
John Lord
published
3.16
David Packo
published 3.5
3.11
Michael Yoder
published
3.07
Dennis Jones
published 3
3.03
David Berk
published 3.5
Edward Willett
published
Haral Tsitsivas
published
Todd MacCallum
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Homans + Peter Barbaresi6264% games+8.6% vs expected
John Homans + Michael Yoder314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Homans
14W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.54
Peter Barbaresi
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
Jeffrey Heald
27W–23L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
David Nachreiner
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
John Lord
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
David Packo
11W–26L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
Michael Yoder
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.11
3
Dennis Jones
2W–15L career · type A · no lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.07
3.5
David Berk
2W–9L career · no lines in 2023
42%58%<1%
3.03
Edward Willett
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Haral Tsitsivas
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Todd MacCallum
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.