Teams

SGV Ball Hogs-Yip-Arroyo/SA4

2025 Adult Division - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#3 DoublesCARA Yokomizo / Annemarie Schnedler vs Trecia Mendoza / DARCELIA WILSON5-7, 1-6
L#1 DoublesCARA Yokomizo / Yoko Kanayama vs Alma Banuelos / Peggy Stahlheber3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCARA Yokomizo / Theresa Sterling vs Amy Soong Tsai / Lia Durham4-6, 4-6
2025-06-08vs SGV Rolling Smashers-Kagan-WN/SULost 01
L#1 DoublesTheresa Sterling / CARA Yokomizo vs Keiko Kagan / Laura Laun3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCARA Yokomizo / Theresa Sterling vs Angeline Chow / Kimberly Albright6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesKristelle Yale / Margie Englis vs Jill Mastroluca / Charlotte Pereira Reisch6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Umaa Rebbapragada
published
3.52
Brett Bennett
published 3.5
3.48
Esther Hwang
published
3.37
Margie Englis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.33
Jenny Lin
published
3.32
Stacey Zhao
published
3.25
Kristelle Yale
published
3.21
Annemarie Schnedler
published 3.5
3.16
Yoko Kanayama
published
3.08
Theresa Sterling
published
2.98
Mae Ushigome
published
2.90
Eileen Yip
published
2.70
CARA Yokomizo
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margie Englis + Brett Bennett123 matchesnot enough data
Annemarie Schnedler + Kristelle Yale033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Umaa Rebbapragada
13W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.54
3.5
Brett Bennett
65W–54L career · no lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Esther Hwang
17W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.48
3.5
Margie Englis
169W–111L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%17%
3.37
Jenny Lin
14W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.33
Stacey Zhao
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.32
Kristelle Yale
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Annemarie Schnedler
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Yoko Kanayama
5W–13L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Theresa Sterling
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Mae Ushigome
0W–6L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
Eileen Yip
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
CARA Yokomizo
23W–61L career · 5 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.