Teams

Net Ninjas - Longview

2025 NETX Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 MIXED

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-06-29vs BakerLost 01
L#1 DoublesMargaret Leitner / Craig Hickerson vs Michael Sessions / Ann Skogerboe5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-29vs BakerWon 30
W#1 DoublesCraig Hickerson / Christine Kjosa vs Samuel Baker / Christina Nunez6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSkip Morton / Margaret Leitner vs Paul Min / Kimberly Henry6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRussell Ivey / Kathleen Wheeler vs Jimmy Williams / Sherrie Lewis6-0, 7-6
2025-06-28vs BakerWon 21
L#1 DoublesRussell Ivey / Cindy Coleman vs Peter Heckmann / Christina Nunez5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRob Dailey / Kathleen Wheeler vs Sherrie Lewis / Jimmy Williams7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesKevin Jones / Margaret Leitner vs Matthew Zimmerer / Lisa Losack1-6, 4-3
2025-06-28vs BakerWon 21
L#1 DoublesKevin Jones / Margaret Leitner vs Peter Heckmann / Ann Skogerboe6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesRob Dailey / Kathleen Wheeler vs Tonya Baker / Samuel Baker6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCraig Hickerson / Christine Kjosa vs Paul Min / Kimberly Henry5-7, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MIXED have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Rob Dailey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Russell Ivey
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Cindy Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Christine Kjosa
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Deesa Loving
published 3.5
3.20
Margaret Leitner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.87
Craig Hickerson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Skip Morton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Craig Hickerson + Margaret Leitner044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rob Dailey
7W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.80
Russell Ivey
20W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Cindy Coleman
16W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Christine Kjosa
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Deesa Loving
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.25
Margaret Leitner
24W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Craig Hickerson
2W–12L career · 3 lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
2.87
Skip Morton
7W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.