← Teams

SHC-Trank

2019 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.19 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Chris van Leeuwen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Patricia Eargle
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Mary Rudinsky
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.90
Jennifer Trank
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
—
Anne Hamburg
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
—
Linnette Donohue
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Theresa Gonzales
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.73
Nancy Heck
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results13 ties
2019-06-29Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesNancy Heck / Lisa Mayer vs Cristi Searls / Viktoria Ralph6-4, 6-2
2019-06-28Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesNancy Heck / Betty Roux vs Marie Carver / Carol Kay Riedl6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2019-06-28Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesAlexandra Gewant / Mary Rudinsky vs Wendy Vaughn / Theresa Hagerty6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesChris van Leeuwen vs Rebecca Arguello6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLinnette Donohue / Carissa Raleigh vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2019-06-27Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesNancy Heck / Betty Roux vs Nancy Bettesworth / Joyce Schroeder4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2019-06-22Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesPatricia Eargle / Mary Rudinsky vs Trish Peters / Jill Watson6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNancy Heck / Jennifer Trank vs Carin Riley / Margaret Huck6-3, 6-1
2019-06-09Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesPatricia Eargle / Nancy Heck vs Megan Clifford / Erin Doucet6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesAnne Hamburg vs Michele Sutherland6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJennifer Trank / Chris van Leeuwen vs Susan Gallegos / Susan Rolfe7-6, 6-2
2019-06-01Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesIvy Lane / Mary Rudinsky vs Nancy Good / Ming Shyan Kao7-6, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPatricia Eargle / Kathi Hermanski vs Renee Niebergall / Jennifer Wiencek6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAlexandra Gewant / Linnette Donohue vs Karla Hendrickson / Creagh Schoen6-3, 6-2
2019-05-19Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesNancy Heck / Ivy Lane vs Rachel Young / Brooke Daniel6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPatricia Eargle / Carissa Raleigh vs Patries Ferguson / Tove Maloco6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesAnne Hamburg vs Amy Cooney6-1, 6-1
2019-05-11Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesCarissa Raleigh / Mary Rudinsky vs Rosaleen Harte / Nancy Kirsch6-2, 7-5
L#1 SinglesAnne Hamburg vs Amy Ouellette6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Trank / Chris van Leeuwen vs Susan Block / Jane Sadowski6-1, 6-3
2019-05-05Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesPatricia Eargle / Carissa Raleigh vs Ericka Nelson / Chelsea Barbour4-5
W#2 SinglesAnne Hamburg vs Angela Diaz de Leon6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTheresa Gonzales / Linnette Donohue vs Anne Mangan / Megan Higgins6-1, 7-5
2019-04-27Lost 2–3
W#1 DoublesPatricia Eargle / Ivy Lane vs Parish Burns / Amy Carolan3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesChris van Leeuwen vs May Graham6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Heck / Mary Rudinsky vs Angie Stromquist / Teufelin Traylen6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesTheresa Gonzales vs Miriam Habafy7-6, 6-0
L#3 DoublesStefanie Orrick / Jennifer Trank vs Tiffany Bowie / Kimbra Kasch6-3, 6-0
2018-12-02Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesSara Meier / Nancy Heck vs Betsy Henningsen / Teresa Metke6-3, 7-5
2018-12-01Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesNancy Heck / Robin Welter vs Elizabeth Burns / Diane Malhotra6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Chris van Leeuwen
90W–38L career
0%93%7%
3.39
3.5
Patricia Eargle
64W–51L career
1%98%1%
3.29
3.5
Mary Rudinsky
50W–42L career
18%82%0%
3.08
3
Jennifer Trank
93W–104L career
0%96%4%
2.90
3
Anne Hamburg
7W–14L career
not enough data
—
3
Linnette Donohue
20W–28L career
not enough data
—
3
Theresa Gonzales
14W–43L career
4%94%2%
2.75
3
Nancy Heck
17W–17L career
6%92%2%
2.73

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.