Teams

Hillbent & Bullheaded

2025 Frederick Combo · Frederick Combo 7.5 Men

16 players · average NTRP 3.71 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-11-13vs NgoTek 7.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesChristopher Bullman / Kevin Hill vs Juan Jose Tijero / Gerald McClellan6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesIra Daar / Eric Thomsen vs Bradley Jacques / Majed Hamawy6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesIvan Kozliak / Joseph Jacangelo vs Connor Newlon / Jaipaul Agonus6-4, 6-4
2025-11-05vs NgoTek 7.5Split 11
L#2 DoublesIvan Kozliak / James Smith vs Bradley Jacques / J Blue5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesIra Daar / Joseph Jacangelo vs Connor Newlon / Gerald McClellan6-3, 6-2
2025-10-28vs NgoTek 7.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesFlorent Verdier / Sricharan Mahavadi vs Alexander Gerson / Jaipaul Agonus6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChristopher Bullman / Kevin Hill vs Lukas Sanidas / Majed Hamawy6-2, 6-4
2025-10-25vs NgoTek 7.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesIra Daar / Kevin Hill vs Lukas Sanidas / Jason Clark6-4, 6-4
2025-10-18vs NgoTek 7.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Burks / Ira Daar vs Joseph Bahorich / Prannoy Namala7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRyan Poole / Joseph Jacangelo vs Juan Jose Tijero / Jagannath Surampudi3-6, 3-6
2025-10-13vs NgoTek 7.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesJoshua Zoltek / Christopher Bullman vs Joseph Bahorich / Brandon Yen6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSricharan Mahavadi / Ivan Kozliak vs Bradley Jacques / Gerald McClellan6-3, 6-3
2025-10-08vs NgoTek 7.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesFlorent Verdier / Sricharan Mahavadi vs John Rian / Brandon Yen6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesRyan Poole / Ira Daar vs Juan Jose Tijero / Apoorv Prasad2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesIvan Kozliak / Eric Parker vs Connor Newlon / Jagannath Surampudi6-0, 6-1
2025-10-02vs NgoTek 7.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesIvan Kozliak / Joseph Jacangelo vs Prannoy Namala / Joseph Bahorich3-6, 0-6
2025-09-24vs NgoTek 7.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesJoshua Zoltek / Victor Sanchez vs John Rian / Gerald McClellan6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDerek Johnson / Christopher Bullman vs Bradley Jacques / Jagannath Surampudi6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesFlorent Verdier / Sricharan Mahavadi vs Nhat Ngo / J Blue4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Frederick Combo 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Joshua Zoltek
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.98
Christopher Bullman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.86
Eric DesRoberts
published
3.84
Derek Johnson
published 3.5
3.70
Sricharan Mahavadi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Kevin Hill
published
3.60
Ivan Kozliak
usually #3 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.55
Eric Parker
published
3.49
Michael Burks
published
3.45
Florent Verdier
published
3.38
Ira Daar
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.37
Ryan Poole
published
3.33
Eric Thomsen
published
3.30
Victor Sanchez
published
3.03
Joseph Jacangelo
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Renato Damas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eric Parker + Derek Johnson5067% games+10.0% vs expected
Kevin Hill + Derek Johnson12066% games+7.6% vs expected
Joshua Zoltek + Christopher Bullman10363% games+4.0% vs expected
Kevin Hill + Christopher Bullman6156% games−1.8% vs expected
Ivan Kozliak + Joshua Zoltek1442% gamesnot enough data
Ira Daar + Eric Parker314 matchesnot enough data
Joshua Zoltek + Kevin Hill404 matchesnot enough data
Joseph Jacangelo + Ira Daar213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Joshua Zoltek
236W–137L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
4.13
4
Christopher Bullman
185W–78L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.98
Eric DesRoberts
41W–23L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.86
3.5
Derek Johnson
58W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.84
4
Sricharan Mahavadi
26W–16L career · 6 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Kevin Hill
59W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.67
4
Ivan Kozliak
300W–286L career · 7 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
Eric Parker
32W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.55
Michael Burks
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
Florent Verdier
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Ira Daar
75W–93L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Ryan Poole
27W–30L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Eric Thomsen
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.33
Victor Sanchez
32W–27L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3
Joseph Jacangelo
153W–161L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
Renato Damas
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.