← Teams

MAC-Leedy

2020 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.5 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Joe Conyard
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.48
Jeanette Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Sara Crate
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Jeffrey Bayless
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Tim Leatherman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Brooke Daniel
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Rudy Martinez
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.04
Catherine Leedy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.86
Matthew Casimo
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.76
Carol Robertson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results8 ties
2019-11-10Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesWalt Crate / Jeanette Thomas vs Bill Lowblad / Mary Lowblad6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCarol Robertson / Robert Crawford vs Alison Davis / Neville Mehta6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesRudy Martinez / Sara Crate vs Eunhee Heller / Steve Vanderploeg7-6, 6-4
2019-11-02Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesWalt Crate / Sara Crate vs Frank Brown / Nora Semonsen6-0, 6-3
2019-10-26Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesBrooke Daniel / Joe Conyard vs Megan Daniels / Brenner Daniels2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Walt Crate vs Chrys Culver / Greg Culver7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesSara Crate / Rudy Martinez vs Amy Murphy / Les Wellman1-6, 7-6, 1-0
2019-10-19Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesBrooke Daniel / Matthew Casimo vs Debbie Frankel / GARREN WEINER6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKristin Eckelman / Tim Leatherman vs Colleen Nolan / Jason Fitzgerald1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Dave Hall vs Carla Scott / Bala Prashanth Reddy Chappidi7-6, 7-6
2019-10-13Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesDeb Garris / Tim Leatherman vs Liz DelPlato / William DelPlato3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrooke Daniel / Joe Conyard vs Crystal Bryant / Christopher Shaw6-4, 6-0
2019-10-04Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesDeb Garris / Tim Leatherman vs Lyndsey Matteson / Jason Garl6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCarol Robertson / Matthew Casimo vs Katie Johansson / Sebastian Llados Vila6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBrooke Daniel / Joe Conyard vs Lia Irvin / Stefano Cavallucci6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2019-09-21Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Tim Leatherman vs Kirk Planck / Carla Wheeler6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSara Crate / Walt Crate vs Aaron Stout / Jinquan Wu6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesBeth Burczak / Jeffrey Bayless vs Chynh Vo / Anne Lang6-2, 6-3
2019-09-14Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesJeanette Thomas / Matthew Casimo vs Karen Pickering / David Smiley4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristin Eckelman / Jeffrey Bayless vs Andrew Geisler / Sarah Kaufman6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Dave Hall vs Andrea Kropp / Karl Kropp6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Joe Conyard
52W–50L career
not enough data
—
4
Jeanette Thomas
89W–74L career
40%60%0%
3.48
3.5
Sara Crate
92W–86L career
0%88%12%
3.47
3.5
Jeffrey Bayless
130W–100L career
0%99%1%
3.30
3.5
Tim Leatherman
52W–36L career
3%95%2%
3.26
3.5
Brooke Daniel
66W–48L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Rudy Martinez
45W–105L career
3%97%0%
3.18
3.5
Catherine Leedy
86W–119L career
23%77%0%
3.04
3
Matthew Casimo
40W–103L career
0%98%2%
2.86
3
Carol Robertson
15W–33L career
2%96%1%
2.76

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.