Teams

Ba.Wait18T

2023 Cap Tri-Level 18 & Over · 2.5-3.0-3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.07 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-13vs Je.Sagal Solomon18TLost 01
L#1 DoublesBarbra Wait / Debra Phillips vs Sharon Horton / Bearta Alchacar2-6, 3-6
2023-07-11vs Ka.Warren18TLost 02
L#1 DoublesBarbra Wait / Debra Phillips vs McKenzie Keenan Osman / Martha Sanders0-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChristy Sandy / Diana Kennedy vs Jennifer Badham / Lorah Henry1-6, 2-6
2023-07-06vs Ti.Dahir18TLost 02
L#2 DoublesAshley Burch / Vickie Dagit vs Tina Dahir / Megan Lynch2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKrystal Glover / Julia Hash vs Sara Mazurak / Stephanie Poley2-6, 3-6
2023-06-15vs In.Navarro18TSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBarbra Wait / Debra Phillips vs Dana Aderhold / Wurth Drummond6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDiana Kennedy / Vickie Dagit vs Lee Anne Oxford / Leigh Stallings1-6, 2-6
2023-06-08vs To.Sutler18TLost 01
L#1 DoublesLee Berrios-Smothers / Debra Phillips vs Haleigh Broglin / Susan Hackman6-7, 3-6
2023-06-01vs Je.Van Campen18TLost 01
L#1 DoublesLee Berrios-Smothers / Joy Millikan vs Lily Li / Ann Skvarcius2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5-3.0-3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Debra Phillips
published 3.5
2.91
Lee Berrios-Smothers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Christy Sandy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Barbra Wait
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Debra Vaughn
published 3
2.52
Vickie Dagit
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.51
Kimberly Roberts
published
2.46
Krystal Glover
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Joan Clifford
published
Julia Hash
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lee Berrios-Smothers + Barbra Wait3840% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Debra Phillips
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Lee Berrios-Smothers
78W–107L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Christy Sandy
42W–45L career · 1 line in 2023
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Barbra Wait
63W–140L career · 3 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Debra Vaughn
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
2.63
3
Vickie Dagit
28W–96L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
2.52
Kimberly Roberts
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%48%52%
2.51
3
Krystal Glover
36W–63L career · type A · 1 line in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.46
Joan Clifford
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Julia Hash
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.