Teams

Huegerich/LHCC/Foothills

2024 Foothills Combo Doubles - 40 & over · 7.5 Combo Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-16vs Swisher/INDP/FoothillsWon 10
W#2 DoublesEverett Wohlbruck / Chris Lovern vs Jim Heisler / Alex Boone6-2, 6-4
2024-09-25vs Swisher/INDP/FoothillsLost 01
L#2 DoublesChris Lovern / Mark Huegerich vs Aaron Steen / Douglas Lee Honeycutt Jr2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-09-18vs Miller/DV/FoothillsLost 01
L#3 DoublesJeremy East / Jeff Prince vs Lee Brodeur / Christopher Stone4-6, 3-6
2024-09-03vs Swisher/INDP/FoothillsLost 01
L#1 DoublesDustin Deal / Jeff Prince vs Scott Robinson / Douglas Lee Honeycutt Jr0-6, 2-6
2024-08-28vs Miller/DV/FoothillsWon 10
W#2 DoublesDrew Smith / Chris Lovern vs David Sprague / Jathan Sharkey4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Combo Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Chad East
published 4
3.70
Everett Wohlbruck
published
3.67
Jeremy East
published
3.67
Haynes King
published
3.62
Scott Wimmer
published
3.62
Dustin Deal
published
3.58
Mark Huegerich
published
3.54
Chris Lovern
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.51
Lawrence Thompson
published
3.38
Jeff Prince
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Hank Eimer
published
3.25
Allen Finley
published 3.5
3.20
CJ Hines
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Lovern + Jeff Prince3251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chad East
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Everett Wohlbruck
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.70
Jeremy East
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Haynes King
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
Scott Wimmer
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
Dustin Deal
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.62
Mark Huegerich
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Chris Lovern
73W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.54
Lawrence Thompson
22W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Jeff Prince
23W–25L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.38
Hank Eimer
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Allen Finley
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
CJ Hines
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.