Teams

MARIN TC 55AM7.0A

2024 ADULT 55&Over · Men 7.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-20vs GOLDMAN TC 55AM7.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesDerek Boorse / Mark Clem vs Jack Daley / Joe Theisen2-6, 3-6
2024-04-29vs HARBOR PT 55AM7.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesDerek Boorse / Jeff Loebbaka vs David Barker / Michael Cole6-0, 6-4
2024-04-21vs NOVATO TC/PIONEER PK 55AM7.0AWon 10
W#2 DoublesDerek Boorse / Tassos Papadimos vs Todd Fields / Scott Griffiths6-1, 6-3
2024-03-25vs GOLDMAN TC 55AM7.0ALost 01
L#1 DoublesDerek Boorse / Mark Clem vs Eric Rasmussen / Calvin Lee2-6, 4-6
2024-03-21vs SCOTT VALLEY 55AM7.0AWon 10
W#1 DoublesMark Clem / Derek Boorse vs Jerry Labay / Alex Taft6-2, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Tassos Papadimos
published
3.50
Elliott Magnuson
published
3.39
Jeff Loebbaka
published
3.34
Derek Boorse
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.28
Monte Zweben
published
3.25
Jeffrey Kent
published
3.25
Mark Clem
published
David Neagle
published 3.5
3.19
Babak Jamasbi
published 3.5
3.18
Rob Cochran
published
3.18
Stacy Nimmo
published
3.15
Gervais Tompkin
published
3.10
Andrew Fremier
published 3.5
3.09
Keith Denkler
published
Michael Swezy
published
Tom Schmierer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elliott Magnuson + Jeff Loebbaka3356% gamesnot enough data
Elliott Magnuson + Mark Clem213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tassos Papadimos
12W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%19%81%
3.62
Elliott Magnuson
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.50
Jeff Loebbaka
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
4
Derek Boorse
137W–176L career · 5 lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
3.34
Monte Zweben
0W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.28
Jeffrey Kent
14W–13L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Mark Clem
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
David Neagle
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Babak Jamasbi
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Rob Cochran
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Stacy Nimmo
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Gervais Tompkin
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Andrew Fremier
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
Keith Denkler
3W–10L career · no lines in 2024
25%74%<1%
3.09
Michael Swezy
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tom Schmierer
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.