Teams

Mercer-CC

2026 CORTA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring · Women 2.5

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-07vs Fuller-CCWon 21
W#1 DoublesWanda Berry / Isia Jenkins vs Grier Hay / Heather Kelley6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesParis Gardner vs Alison Jordan1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMarjorie Borromeo / Beverly Rumley vs Robin Deardeuff / Melinda Wallace6-1, 6-0
2026-03-02vs Champion-CCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesBeverly Rumley / Marjorie Borromeo vs Sarah Gibson / Katelyn Spellman3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesIsia Jenkins vs Margaret Wallace6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesKristin Mercer / Wanda Berry vs Erin Murphy / Morgan Muller6-0, 6-0
2026-02-28vs Brown-CCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristin Mercer / Isia Jenkins vs Tracey Johnson / Deb Willoughby6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesParis Gardner vs Alison Brown6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBeverly Rumley / Leigh Yaughn vs Tawaina Coleman / Amy Diehl6-1, 6-1
2026-02-23vs Champion-CCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristin Mercer / Bianca Brown vs Sarah Gibson / Madi McMichael Moseley6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesIsia Jenkins vs Katelyn Spellman6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMarjorie Borromeo / Paris Gardner vs Ansley Mcknight / Erin Murphy6-0, 6-0
2026-02-18vs Eagle-CCWon 21
L#1 DoublesIsia Jenkins / Samantha Welch vs Shirley Beck / Elizabeth Madden3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKristin Mercer vs Robyn Ridley6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesRawlanda Hercules / Marjorie Borromeo vs Andrea Eagle / Taylor Cusack6-4, 6-0
2026-02-07vs Fuller-CCWon 21
W#1 DoublesKristin Mercer / Wanda Berry vs Robin Deardeuff / Heather Hudson6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesMarjorie Borromeo vs Alison Jordan4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBeverly Rumley / Leigh Yaughn vs Melinda Wallace / Christine Villegas6-1, 6-1
2026-02-06vs CORTA/Tammy RebidueLost 12
L#1 DoublesMarjorie Borromeo / Paris Gardner vs Angela Byrd / Hallie Taylor7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesIsia Jenkins vs Allora Fleming3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKristin Mercer / Jessica Teal vs Tammy Rebidue / Jennifer Joyner2-6, 1-6
2026-01-24vs Kraus-CCWon 30
W#1 DoublesKristin Mercer / Isia Jenkins vs Shalen Lockhart / Brenda Kosobucki6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesBianca Brown vs Suzanne Kraus7-5, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBeverly Rumley / Paris Gardner vs Irene Shaver / Mary Lee Holm7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Women 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CORTA/Tammy Rebidue7119514175
2Mercer-CC6217716154
3Brown-CC2661836245
4Eagle-CC0851941274

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.48
Kristin Mercer
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.47
Wanda Berry
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.45
Bianca Brown
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.30
Beverly Rumley
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.27
Isia Jenkins
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.26
Marjorie Borromeo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.23
Paris Gardner
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Jessica Teal
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Leigh Yaughn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rawlanda Hercules
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Samantha Welch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Mercer + Isia Jenkins3258% gamesnot enough data
Wanda Berry + Kristin Mercer404 matchesnot enough data
Bianca Brown + Kristin Mercer404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Mercer
17W–16L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%55%45%
2.48
Wanda Berry
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%59%41%
2.47
2.5
Bianca Brown
19W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%65%35%
2.45
2.5
Beverly Rumley
12W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.30
2.5
Isia Jenkins
20W–27L career · 11 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
Marjorie Borromeo
11W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.26
Paris Gardner
14W–15L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
Jessica Teal
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Leigh Yaughn
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rawlanda Hercules
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Samantha Welch
0W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.